altiverb vs scope reverbs
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
sorry, the full list of reverbs used on the examples
guitar: ArtsAcoustic, P100, MV-pro, PT2016
drums: MV-pro, P100, ArtsAcoustic, PT2016
vocal : P100, PT2016, MV-pro, ArtsAcoustic
cheers, Tom
guitar: ArtsAcoustic, P100, MV-pro, PT2016
drums: MV-pro, P100, ArtsAcoustic, PT2016
vocal : P100, PT2016, MV-pro, ArtsAcoustic
cheers, Tom
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
the pt2016 was absolutely wonderful reverb sound , what do u mean he quit devices? is there no posisble way to buy or download this reverb??
cheers
cheers
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
i was playing more with p-100 reverb demo and found it really good for certain things like electric guitar, butt im still looking for a certain type of sound im yet to hear in any scope reverb i try out
heres a demo i just made of this kind of sound im looking for from one of my favorite vst verbs-uhe ambient processor. any body know of a scope reverb that sings so clear and beautiful as this?
cheers

cheers
- Attachments
-
[The extension mp3 has been deactivated and can no longer be displayed.]
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
That reminds me of the reverb that used to come with the korg oasys PCI "o verb"
but im not a big expret on reverbs at all !
but im not a big expret on reverbs at all !
- Jonathan T
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
Interesting comparison, thanks Tom
FWIW, sticking my head above the parapet....
I liked the PT2016 best for both vocals and guitar, for drums the P100 shaded the ArtsAcoustic for me.
In all three I had the MVPro bottom...but I own it and use it regularly
BTW I did do the tests 'blind' before looking at Tom's answers!
Where can I find Warp's P100/A100, Google or a PlanetZ search didn't get me there, or didn't I try hard enough?
Thanks
Jonathan
FWIW, sticking my head above the parapet....
I liked the PT2016 best for both vocals and guitar, for drums the P100 shaded the ArtsAcoustic for me.
In all three I had the MVPro bottom...but I own it and use it regularly

BTW I did do the tests 'blind' before looking at Tom's answers!
Where can I find Warp's P100/A100, Google or a PlanetZ search didn't get me there, or didn't I try hard enough?
Thanks
Jonathan
Last edited by Jonathan T on Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
@heizen33 that's pretty much exactly the soundprint of the PT reverbs, no wonder you liked that most.
Unfortunately I bought only one of the small versions as I had only a 4 DSP card that time.
The bigger ones are much smoother.
I can't come convincingly close to your u-he pling example (my 2016 has 8 taps, the 2036 has 18), but I can 'beat' the vocal with the same device, so the result seems quite source depending.
Anyway, for 149 bucks the UHBIK package is a great offer and seems really useful, thanks for pointing it out.
here's a thread where someone asked the same question. John provided a contact link to Paul's reverb site, which is still online and you also can download demos, but the sales part doesn't work anymore.
cheers, Tom
Unfortunately I bought only one of the small versions as I had only a 4 DSP card that time.
The bigger ones are much smoother.
I can't come convincingly close to your u-he pling example (my 2016 has 8 taps, the 2036 has 18), but I can 'beat' the vocal with the same device, so the result seems quite source depending.
Anyway, for 149 bucks the UHBIK package is a great offer and seems really useful, thanks for pointing it out.
according to GaryB ...Paul Tanti used to work for Creamware North America and he used to obsess about reverbs. there were Scope systems in real studios at the time which were built strictly to run his reverbs, so the legends go......the pt2016 was absolutely wonderful reverb sound , what do u mean he quit devices?
here's a thread where someone asked the same question. John provided a contact link to Paul's reverb site, which is still online and you also can download demos, but the sales part doesn't work anymore.
cheers, Tom
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
yes, I also regret I didn't buy a 'bigger' version - admittedly I often neglect the device due it's enormous amount of knobs... shame on me...Jonathan T wrote: ... I liked the PT2016 best for both vocals and guitar, for drums the P100 shaded the ArtsAcoustic for me...

( actually I would discourage anyone to download the old PT demos and use them under Scope4.
I seem to have a kind of a mess since then, that also affects other reverbs - I'll verify that and post it here... )
forget it - the problem is related to my system



cheers, Tom
Last edited by astroman on Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jonathan T
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
- next to nothing
- Posts: 2521
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
Oh and do try hifibooms free verb: http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=22376
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
There was a free reverb called PT2012, I got it here on Z. I guess this is one of the Early First reverbs you're talking about. I like it a lot, it sounds completely artificial and exaggerated, but in a very musical way. This is the thread it's in: http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php ... lit=reverb
I also found a PT-free-96 K Beta on this thread, but I haven't tried it yet: http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php ... lit=reverb
And I second the recomendation to try out Hifiboom's RSVP reverb - it's surprisingly good!
BTW: Thank you Astroman for taking the time to do the head to head reverb test.
Cheerz,
T
I also found a PT-free-96 K Beta on this thread, but I haven't tried it yet: http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php ... lit=reverb
And I second the recomendation to try out Hifiboom's RSVP reverb - it's surprisingly good!
BTW: Thank you Astroman for taking the time to do the head to head reverb test.
Cheerz,
T
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
next to nothing wrote:Oh and do try hifibooms free verb: http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=22376

anyway - my apologies to hifi that I didn't mention his device

it's not teakable up to the details, but that's often an advantage if you need a good result quickly. This one is very convenient to set up.
heizen33's test-file shows an interesting side effect:
the pling sound get's very well encoded, but the reverbed voice becomes really harsh - imho by the mp3 process.
cheers, Tom
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
Here's another just in case you ever need a 5.1 surround verb.
I can't try that out yet, but I use it as a multiple reverb as it can have 2 stero and 1 mono layered when your not in 5.1.
I used an early reflection then a large stage/room and then the mono for the details.
But it gets a real nice sound and you don't need to use more than one.
Light on the resources too. I can load several with one 15 DSP card.
I can't try that out yet, but I use it as a multiple reverb as it can have 2 stero and 1 mono layered when your not in 5.1.
I used an early reflection then a large stage/room and then the mono for the details.
But it gets a real nice sound and you don't need to use more than one.
Light on the resources too. I can load several with one 15 DSP card.
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
We want him back. this is the perfect time as xite is coming and lots of ppl here need pro reverbs(compare to sys6000 or pcm 91) currently l like p100 but sonic timeworks stop working with scope!!! p100/a100 came 4 years ago! i guess dirk(BX) also quit!! since sc is continue with scope and xite is coming i hope programmers should get interested so that we all win and do some business.astroman wrote:according to GaryB ...Paul Tanti used to work for Creamware North America and he used to obsess about reverbs. there were Scope systems in real studios at the time which were built strictly to run his reverbs, so the legends go......the pt2016 was absolutely wonderful reverb sound , what do u mean he quit devices?
here's a thread where someone asked the same question. John provided a contact link to Paul's reverb site, which is still online and you also can download demos, but the sales part doesn't work anymore.
cheers, Tom
thanks
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
http://www.innerverse.com/earlyfirst/de ... e=purchase
he is not dead yet.
he is not dead yet.
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
Well - you have PCM91 quality reverbs.firubbi wrote:We want him back. this is the perfect time as xite is coming and lots of ppl here need pro reverbs(compare to sys6000 or pcm 91)
What do you mean by "sonic timeworks stop working with scope!!!"??firubbi wrote:currently l like p100 but sonic timeworks stop working with scope!!! p100/a100 came 4 years ago!
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
You could recreate them in Scope SDK, if he's gone for good.firubbi wrote:We want him back.
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
just to clarify...firubbi wrote:http://www.innerverse.com/earlyfirst/de ... e=purchase
he is not dead yet.
the meaning of coming soon on his site was already asked by customers when Paul was still active as a developer...

the site has simply been frozen since then
cheers, Tom
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
@warp I didn’t meant to say stw quit. But they didn’t done anything after p100/a100. and im dying for another great reverb after p100 or even better.i love to use p100 on vocals but sometimes I get bore with the same sound. even I thought about tc_vss3 but powercore has firewire which has flaws as garyb mention on a topic. And most of the developers here love to do compressor, eq, mixer .. modulation plugs and synths.though das has few good reverb. about pt2016 … I like the sound a lot. Wish i get one. And I like your idea if sc can recreate the sound. Who knows xite reverb will hell better.
Re: altiverb vs scope reverbs
You could try the DAS reverbs, if you want a different sound. Or you could even try a SSL Duende system.
I would imagine that new and awesome reverbs will be released on XITE because of the memory.
I would imagine that new and awesome reverbs will be released on XITE because of the memory.