Hi,
I was just wondering, would it be possible that someone created a device like this ?
I mean a real Attack-alike device, the other drum devices aren't too bad either, but Attack is awsome !
I wouldn't mind paying for a genuine Attack clone, if only it would be of equal quality like the original VSTi and not sample based.
Any creative programmers around ?
Ronald.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RoonSmits on 2002-08-20 12:51 ]</font>
Attack, first a VSTi, then Hardware, maybe next a Pulsar dev
Well I'm still saveing up for LAP 5.2 and LC.
But as a Pulsar device we could benefit from the multiple outputs. From what I've heard/read is, that it is kind of a hassle to get the multiple outs working on certain VSTi-s in Logic. Please don't tell me to switch to Cubase SX, hell I'll stay with Logic for the next couple of years! My 1Ghz P-III with XP-pro will do just fine. Since music is my hobby, I won't buy a "Pro machine" like a Macintosh. I just can't justify such a big investment.
On the other hand, I shouldn't be comparing a 1Ghz RISC to a 2Ghz CISC processor, that's not fair. But if I had the money I would buy one. ( Just have a look at the new dual proc mac, DROOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLL ! )
Ronald
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RoonSmits on 2002-08-20 17:41 ]</font>
But as a Pulsar device we could benefit from the multiple outputs. From what I've heard/read is, that it is kind of a hassle to get the multiple outs working on certain VSTi-s in Logic. Please don't tell me to switch to Cubase SX, hell I'll stay with Logic for the next couple of years! My 1Ghz P-III with XP-pro will do just fine. Since music is my hobby, I won't buy a "Pro machine" like a Macintosh. I just can't justify such a big investment.
On the other hand, I shouldn't be comparing a 1Ghz RISC to a 2Ghz CISC processor, that's not fair. But if I had the money I would buy one. ( Just have a look at the new dual proc mac, DROOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLL ! )
Ronald
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RoonSmits on 2002-08-20 17:41 ]</font>
I guess you refer to the DrumVox as this comes very close to what I've read about the Attack (haven't found a demo on CD yet).
You use one for each part of the drum box, seems to keep DSP hunger at bay (4 ticks usage on Pulsar 1 per module).
I've connected 4 of them to a common midi source and a micromixer as submix.
Would be nice if you'd compare it to the Waldorf, imho Stephen definetely knows how to do crunchy punchy devices.
cheers, Tom
You use one for each part of the drum box, seems to keep DSP hunger at bay (4 ticks usage on Pulsar 1 per module).
I've connected 4 of them to a common midi source and a micromixer as submix.
Would be nice if you'd compare it to the Waldorf, imho Stephen definetely knows how to do crunchy punchy devices.
cheers, Tom