Mehdi Touzani Valve Synth Mixer

spacef · Post by **spacef** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:49 pm

steffensen wrote:Is it heavy on DSP?

Thanks for your interest.
6/6.5 dsps
this guy is in las vegas for some special job....

(temporary surface)

Guys, I don't want to make you wait and be mysterious so I will answer the question about the availability of the device.
- it will not be included for free in any package and will not be part of any bundle. it also has to be size down as it is full screen now (this means redoing some parts of the layout)
- I do not know yet how it will be sold (nor when, may be after mess?)
- a few of new features of the FB will make it to the MixsatC2 (the 3 aux and an extra row of insert slots with the preset exchange per channel and cutoff to insert RDII or Satellites for example, to be modulated, as usual, by external modulation/audio/mod patches or by a remote controller).
- The Valve circuit will remain an exclusive feature of the FB mixer for the moment (it's not the same tube filter as in free devices).

that's all i could figure out and agree with myself so far...

dawman · Post by **dawman** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:55 pm

Aren't you suppose to be recuperating from the last week of torture I put you through?

Good, @ least for a few weeks no one can have this juicy bitch !!

Manana Cabrone,

spacef · Post by **spacef** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:33 pm

i'm in the bahamas right now....
nah ... sigh ...

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:56 pm

scope4live wrote:Good, @ least for a few weeks no one can have this juicy bitch !!

egoist! let us at least betatest your instance than!

spacef · Post by **spacef** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:32 pm

Jimmy doesn't have a beta

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:57 pm

so he has an endorsement?

Jimmie must be famous

(just kidding)

dawman · Post by **dawman** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:18 pm

Please Stay Seated,..................................ankyu,............ankyu,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:15 pm

to honor you

Post by **garyb** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:34 pm

put some pants on her.....

dawman · Post by **dawman** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:35 pm

awesome !

Beautiful and perfectly appropriate,

You take a bow now.

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:42 pm

this is the original yet modified picture:

edit: took it away

Post by **garyb** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:47 pm

she doesn't cover her private parts, just her face.....
a dilemma. two hands and so much vulnerability. not fair....

use photoshop wisely. she needs pants.

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:49 pm

she was sleeping, just a complete nock-down late in the morning...
Her head is laying on both her arms.
So, originally even het face is visible

she never would have tolerated me shooting pics if she wasn't asleep

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:06 pm

vulnerability is what it's all about, isn't it

The chromized effect should keep it away from sentiments or vulgarities, so does the flattened sofa.
One idea, just two dimensions, I thought.
I've planned a version where the 3D aspects of the purple sofa will be completely removed. The sofa-in-one-colour will be just a figure of contoures.
If you sqeeze your eyes as much as possible and look at the picture, you will see what I mean

The original-original picture indeed could need a pant, but at the time this wasn't my first concern really (anymore)

Post by **garyb** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:29 pm

love what you do with that program.

Post by **hubird** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:52 pm

thanks

dawman · Post by **dawman** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:21 pm

Nudity is appropriate in the FAT BASTARD thread, all are welcome. Especially if it's done in taste.

There Is Nothing Better In Life Than Wine, Women And Song. Not much has changed since the days of the Vikings, except they didn't have Scope , or the FAT BASTARD !!

King of Snake · Post by **King of Snake** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:30 am

hubird wrote:she was sleeping, just a complete nock-down late in the morning...
Her head is laying on both her arms.
So, originally even het face is visible

she never would have tolerated me shooting pics if she wasn't asleep

not to mention posting them on the innernets!

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:51 am

a perfect body... and a perfect composition in PS

I see few problems while adoring them with respect, though KoS has a point in privacey...

cheers, Tom
admits those feet in a pair of Pradas are almost to die for

Post by **hubird** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:39 am

KoS, you wouldn't recognize her on base of these pics, so I didn't see so much a problem in posting them here.
YouTube would already have been another story

In the end it's not correct, yes