Analogue mixer or not?
Hi,
I'd just like to get a few peoples opinions. I have a powerpulsar and pulsar2. I mix everything inside the computer on the pulsar software and Cubase SX . I am thinking of getting something like a Mackie 8buss analogue mixer and pump out all the tracks into it to get some warmth into the mix. Has anyone done this and does it sound better?
labman
I'd just like to get a few peoples opinions. I have a powerpulsar and pulsar2. I mix everything inside the computer on the pulsar software and Cubase SX . I am thinking of getting something like a Mackie 8buss analogue mixer and pump out all the tracks into it to get some warmth into the mix. Has anyone done this and does it sound better?
labman
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Well, i would only be tempted to do this if i had a really nice desk, maybe one of the old Brit classics. i would say that you might get better results with an expensive pre-amp/recording strip (one with digital in/out to avoid AD/DA conversion) - there are lots of new models based on classic designs, but with digital interfacing. Then you could track any live instruments straight into your DAW, and also send any internal sources you though needed the warmth through your pre-amp. Of course this would be a slower process as you would have to record every source individually and in real-time.
Make sure you mix in SCOPE by bussing the Cubase outputs. And don't forget Vinco is a nice warmer-upper too.
Mr A
Make sure you mix in SCOPE by bussing the Cubase outputs. And don't forget Vinco is a nice warmer-upper too.
Mr A
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I already have an Avalon-737SP but I'm alaways looking for that bit extra. I'm always reading equipment articles and noticed that Mackie claim that the 8buss mixer has EQ quality etc. far beyond it's price tag so I was wondering if anyone has experienced it in a pulsar setup and could give me an insight.
labman
Thanks for your reply. I already have an Avalon-737SP but I'm alaways looking for that bit extra. I'm always reading equipment articles and noticed that Mackie claim that the 8buss mixer has EQ quality etc. far beyond it's price tag so I was wondering if anyone has experienced it in a pulsar setup and could give me an insight.
labman
It's going to sound different, better is so subjective. I would be very surprised if this was the solution to your problem (not enough warmth). I would have to say that you should take a look at what you can do while trackng to increase the feeling of warmth.On 2005-02-23 07:25, Labman wrote:
Hi,
I'd just like to get a few peoples opinions. I have a powerpulsar and pulsar2. I mix everything inside the computer on the pulsar software and Cubase SX . I am thinking of getting something like a Mackie 8buss analogue mixer and pump out all the tracks into it to get some warmth into the mix. Has anyone done this and does it sound better?
labman
To be honest though, I have no experience with this particular board. Can you rent one for a weekend and try it out before buying?
R
- interloper
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: amsterdam
- Contact:
I don't think that you'll get the benefit you are looking for just from the Mackie mixer.
Also, if you sample your sounds, arrange them, then bus out to the mixer, you'll have to sample them again, potentiallly introducing another level of degradation.
If you want warmer sounds, use a good A/D converter.
Also, if you sample your sounds, arrange them, then bus out to the mixer, you'll have to sample them again, potentiallly introducing another level of degradation.
If you want warmer sounds, use a good A/D converter.
You don't awoid the conversions just because you use a preamp with digital i/o. You only move the conversion into the preamp.On 2005-02-23 08:13, Mr Arkadin wrote:
... . i would say that you might get better results with an expensive pre-amp/recording strip (one with digital in/out to avoid AD/DA conversion) ...
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Immanuel wrote:
Mr A
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2005-02-23 15:34 ]</font>
No, i meant avoiding using the SCOPE converters to go to/from a preamp with only analogue input/output. Although the SCOPE converters are good, i'd imagine that a high-end channel would have better ones.You don't awoid the conversions just because you use a preamp with digital i/o. You only move the conversion into the preamp
Mr A
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2005-02-23 15:34 ]</font>
I know several people who use the Mackie and feel its 'ok' but something like an Allen&Heath will probably give you more 'warmth' (and less problems than the 8-bus's ribbon interconnects).
Another (imo better) option would be to cast an eye at the used mixer department. Something with late 70's to mid 80's vintage (do research and determine what years are best for what make/models) should provide adequate headroom for 'warmth'. Just check the mixer for abuse and noise (leaky components inline) before making your final purchase. The Soundtracs 8-bus I wound up with here was on loan to me for 3 months before I finally decided to pay the guy and get it over with.
Another (imo better) option would be to cast an eye at the used mixer department. Something with late 70's to mid 80's vintage (do research and determine what years are best for what make/models) should provide adequate headroom for 'warmth'. Just check the mixer for abuse and noise (leaky components inline) before making your final purchase. The Soundtracs 8-bus I wound up with here was on loan to me for 3 months before I finally decided to pay the guy and get it over with.
yeah, i know mackie's sales line. an old "endorsement" went something like this: "i work on ssls all day long and my mackie 8 bus sounds as good as any ssl i've ever heard." 
if you believe everything a salesman said you'd be lost. don't believe the hype. the mackie is certainly good enough for most work and it is well enough made, but don't even THINK that it will perform like anything exotic. an old british board like an '80s soundcraft or an old tac or amek or neve is one thing. if you have one of those, i wouldn't be surprised if you gave up some convienience to mix there. but for a mackie?(or any of those cheap pa/recording boards) i'd say just use scope or even cubase.
sure, analog summing is nice, but if you're that picky, get a dangerous 2 bus or the like and save space and stress. i seriously doubt if analog summing will be the difference between grammy and garbage.

if you believe everything a salesman said you'd be lost. don't believe the hype. the mackie is certainly good enough for most work and it is well enough made, but don't even THINK that it will perform like anything exotic. an old british board like an '80s soundcraft or an old tac or amek or neve is one thing. if you have one of those, i wouldn't be surprised if you gave up some convienience to mix there. but for a mackie?(or any of those cheap pa/recording boards) i'd say just use scope or even cubase.
sure, analog summing is nice, but if you're that picky, get a dangerous 2 bus or the like and save space and stress. i seriously doubt if analog summing will be the difference between grammy and garbage.
Agreed.On 2005-02-24 05:17, spiderman wrote:
better to invest on very good preamp like great river NV . analogue summing won't give your warmth if the source is cold . the money is on the preamp .
I.m.o. SFP mixers are a big step from most DAW sequencer mixers, at least when it comes to stereo-separation.
Invest in preamps instead, that's a field you really can't work around.
- interloper
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: amsterdam
- Contact:
imho there's objective warmth - subjective to anyone's personal receiptiom, tho
which is associated with certain frequencies...
and fake warmth, associated with the color and touch feeling of a vacuum tube.
The latter isn't that easy to defeat - as everyone knows from restaurant menus, user interface design, brand awareness and last but not least the visual appearance of a person.
One is supposed to not judge the book by the cover, but how to ignore it ?
A converter usually operates in association with a filter, so it's certainly noticable in the frequency domain - imho they all sound different, but I'm not always sure which one sounds best.
But it's definetely not the converter's resolution that defines a 'warm' sound.
An original DX7 completely outperforms NI's FM7 (using Scope converters for example) in that context.
Btw. people have reported that an (almost completely) jitter-free signal 'sounds' cold as artic...
cheers, Tom

and fake warmth, associated with the color and touch feeling of a vacuum tube.
The latter isn't that easy to defeat - as everyone knows from restaurant menus, user interface design, brand awareness and last but not least the visual appearance of a person.
One is supposed to not judge the book by the cover, but how to ignore it ?

A converter usually operates in association with a filter, so it's certainly noticable in the frequency domain - imho they all sound different, but I'm not always sure which one sounds best.
But it's definetely not the converter's resolution that defines a 'warm' sound.
An original DX7 completely outperforms NI's FM7 (using Scope converters for example) in that context.
Btw. people have reported that an (almost completely) jitter-free signal 'sounds' cold as artic...

cheers, Tom
I have this weird idea that, given good clean converters, warmth might be more related to signal source than signal processing.
I guess an easy (but probably not cheap) way of getting some warmth into the mix is sending your mix to a mastering house and have them run it thru some vintage analog mastering compressor-thinger like a L2A2 or Fairchild.
I guess an easy (but probably not cheap) way of getting some warmth into the mix is sending your mix to a mastering house and have them run it thru some vintage analog mastering compressor-thinger like a L2A2 or Fairchild.