Mixer question.Is there a quality difference between
the old Bigmixer V2B and the STM mixers?
Thanks.
Kim
Mixer question
-
PabloFasan
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Using Pulsar OS ver 3.01, the Big Mixer produce a more natural sound than the STM Mixers, but but it (the Big Mixer)sounds bad under SFP .
I think that the OS drivers have an important influence in the sound quality of the mixers.
This is evident due the same devices ("*.dev")change it's sound quality (not only the mixers) depending if they are beeing used under Pulsar 3.01 or SFP.
Having both , personally I prefer the warmer sound of the Big Mixer and SonicTimeworks effects for Pulsar 3.01 OS than the SFP versions.
Also the ASIO drivers and the MME drivers sound different and I'm not referring to the the latency differences.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: PabloFasan on 2003-05-15 00:03 ]</font>
I think that the OS drivers have an important influence in the sound quality of the mixers.
This is evident due the same devices ("*.dev")change it's sound quality (not only the mixers) depending if they are beeing used under Pulsar 3.01 or SFP.
Having both , personally I prefer the warmer sound of the Big Mixer and SonicTimeworks effects for Pulsar 3.01 OS than the SFP versions.
Also the ASIO drivers and the MME drivers sound different and I'm not referring to the the latency differences.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: PabloFasan on 2003-05-15 00:03 ]</font>