old luna mixer and new 1632 mixer

bosone · Post by **bosone** » Sat May 25, 2002 11:00 pm

in what the old luna mixer is different compared to the new 1632 mixer?
i have a luna connected to my pulsar1, but i never installed luna package, because i don't want to break my otherwise perfect system!

can anyone send me the old Luna mixer, so that i can give it a look? ( i supposed I will have to register it to my luna card, isn't it?)
thanks
m.bosi@inwind.it

RedSun · Post by **RedSun** » Sun May 26, 2002 11:09 am

I have worked with the Luna mixer for a few months now and I don't see why I would go back to it.

The STM1632 has more features, a better interface and takes less DSP.

Actually, you might want to use it if you need a relatively light mixer that has more inputs(24) than the 1632.

RedSun .:.

bosone · Post by **bosone** » Sun May 26, 2002 11:02 pm

thanks!
now i know that the old luna mixer is useless! fo submixing i use the "old" micromixer and dinamixer of 3.01
greetings.