As far, as I recall, when I bought my Pulsar1 I was told of 1 or 2ms delays. As most of you know, that is not so. Now I read about the Luna2 on the CW site, and it says ULLI settings at 1ms. For shure this must be with 96k, but:
"Is this only misplaced info - making Luna2 look better, or is it realy possible choose ULLI 1ms on the Luna2?"
Immanuel
What ULLI settings are useable with Luna2?
Yes, it is quite possible. Remember that the Luna II is based on the same technology as the Pulsar II. There has been quite an improvement in latency between the first and second generation of Luna/Pulsar.
Off course, using your Luna II at such low latency requires a very good system to remain stable. This is not a Luna/Pulsar limitation or bug. Getting good performance requires performance parts. If you put the fastest I/O card in a 486 motherboard, don't expect miracles...
You can also use your old Pulsar I and a new Luna II together at the Luna's latency. You'll have to ask MarcusPocus on how to do that. That's the setup he has and it works quite well.
RedSun .:.
Off course, using your Luna II at such low latency requires a very good system to remain stable. This is not a Luna/Pulsar limitation or bug. Getting good performance requires performance parts. If you put the fastest I/O card in a 486 motherboard, don't expect miracles...
You can also use your old Pulsar I and a new Luna II together at the Luna's latency. You'll have to ask MarcusPocus on how to do that. That's the setup he has and it works quite well.
RedSun .:.
