I thought there was a patch for this somewhere but can only find some info relating to a patch for Wavelab. Sorry I can't help more, but search the scope forums for any relevant info and see if that helps.
t_tangent wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:59 am
I thought there was a patch for this somewhere but can only find some info relating to a patch for Wavelab. Sorry I can't help more, but search the scope forums for any relevant info and see if that helps.
garyb wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 7:46 am
well, it's Nuendo trying to make the Scope card do what it will never do, which is to be controlled and setup by Nuendo.
In other words, it would be pointless to ask Nuendo devs for a 'patch' update?
if Steinberg wants to program for children(who can't setup their own soundcard), it will be this way. the Scope card is not a windows soundcard, although it can be used that way. Windows soundcards have an ASIO control panel in the ASIO host and are controlled by the host. Scope cards are controlled by the Scope application. as far as Windows and Nuendo are concerned, the Scope card is external hardware. Windows has absolutely no idea what is happening inside the card, with the dsps.
it is NOT a waste to ask Steinberg to simply stop requiring the soundcard's setup communication with Nuendo. they can simply time out the function and allow the ASIO driver to work without it, but that is not what the overlords want.
garyb wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 8:43 am
it won't matter AT ALL.
if Steinberg wants to program for children(who can't setup their own soundcard), it will be this way. the Scope card is not a windows soundcard, although it can be used that way. Windows soundcards have an ASIO control panel in the ASIO host and are controlled by the host. Scope cards are controlled by the Scope application. as far as Windows and Nuendo are concerned, the Scope card is external hardware. Windows has absolutely no idea what is happening inside the card, with the dsps.
it is NOT a waste to ask Steinberg to simply stop requiring the soundcard's setup communication with Nuendo. they can simply time out the function and allow the ASIO driver to work without it, but that is not what the overlords want.
One thing: Could upgrading to Scope 7.x help in this matter?
Furthermore, I'm also getting a BSOD when trying to switch to ASIO SCOPE PCI ASIO driver for Arturia V 7 Collection standalone VSTi's.
Please keep in mind the era that these cards were sold, and the fact that it still works today is something to be thankful for! How many graphics cards and pro audio cards from 2001/2 are similarly supported for so long? Only RME comes to mind as being similar to what SonicCore has done with their products.
Please keep in mind the era that these cards were sold, and the fact that it still works today is something to be thankful for! How many graphics cards and pro audio cards from 2001/2 are similarly supported for so long? Only RME comes to mind as being similar to what SonicCore has done with their products.
Also note an Xite would be one heck of an upgrade
Yes, that's true, it's almost unbelievable that I still can get a 1ms latency from a Scope (CreamWare) 3DSP card- 18 years after the manufacture date! That's the reason I have a hard time to part with it.
Scope XITE-1 is THE DSP based sound card and it may end on the purchase list soon. But I'll miss the forum then
Plenty of Xite users here, it's the same Scope software after all.
Also, I run my Scope cards in a secondary machine, it simplified a lot of this stuff. Using ADAT/AES/SPDIF and MIDI to connect the two is the only real difference. It also means that machine runs as an ASIO host, which lets me run a few legacy plugins (in bidule) that I can't run without workarounds (32bit>64bit converters) on my DAW system. Plus I have all kinds of other weird fun toys on that machine, that I would never put on my main DAW (open source software, experimental/freeware apps etc).
valis wrote: Fri Dec 06, 2019 12:28 am
Plenty of Xite users here, it's the same Scope software after all.
Also, I run my Scope cards in a secondary machine, it simplified a lot of this stuff. Using ADAT/AES/SPDIF and MIDI to connect the two is the only real difference.
Does such setup allow for, say, i.e. 3 ms at 44kHz and 1 ms at 96kHz latency? In that is the case, it is a possible setup as I have been thinking about a similar solution for a while.
Maybe I have some extreme requirements, although I think that XCITE has less than a 1ms roundtrip. Enough fast for me for that matter.
latency is mainly a function of the CPU. it has only a small element from Scope. Scope is the same latency as hardware, functionally ZERO. it's a real-time device. connected to another machine, the latency is zero. latency in the computer is based on the soundcard and processor. RME and other quality soundcards will be able to do [email protected] when connected to Scope cards via ADAT.
