doubled plugins in scope.rgy keyfile

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

doubled plugins in scope.rgy keyfile

Post by katano »

Hey guys

i recogniced that almost all of my plugins in the scope.rgy exist twice per card and with different keys. just wanna know if it's normal and from where they come? scope 4.5 upgrade?

here's my list of 1 pro card:

Adern FleXor
B-2003
B-2003
bx_digital
bx_digital
DAS-2A St
dynatube Bundle
dynatube Bundle
DynatubeBass
DynatubeBass
dynatubeFT
dynatubeFT
dynatubeJM
dynatubeMB
dynatubeMB
dynatubeVX
dynatubeVX
EDS 16i
EDS 16i
Effects Package 1
Effects Package 1
Effects Package 2
Effects Package 2
Elektra/Modular2
Elektra/Modular2
Graph EQ
Graph EQ
Interpole
Interpole
Main Studiotools Package
Main Studiotools Package
Master Verb Pro
Master Verb Pro
MINIMAX
MINIMAX
Mixer Package 1
Mixer Package 1
Mixer Package 2
Mixer Package 2
Modular 2
Modular III
Modular III
Optimaster
Optimaster
OrbitoneImpressor
Poison
Poison
Pro-12
Pro-12
Prodyssey
PSY Q
PSY Q
Pulsar ProPack
Pulsar ProPack
Pulsar Software
Pulsar Software
RMX160
RMX160
SB404
SB404
SBC
SBC
SCOPE 4.0 Software
SCOPE 4.0 Software
Scope Fusion Platform
Scope Fusion Platform
SCOPE SDK 4.0
Six-String
SL9000
SPLAttacker
SPLAttacker
SPLTransDesg
SPLTransDesg
STS 4000
STS 4000
STS-2000P
STS-2000P
STS-3000
STS-3000
STS-5000
STS-5000
STW Ambience A100
STW Classic Plate
Synthesizer Package 1
Synthesizer Package 1
Synthesizer Package 2
Synthesizer Package 2
VDAT
VDAT
Vectron
Vectron
Vinco
Vinco
Vinco DT
Vinco DT
Vocodizer
Vocodizer
VolksZämpler SFP
VolksZämpler SFP
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Post by dawman »

Nice list Brotha' Man Katano.
User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Post by katano »

thanks brotha' man jimmy :-) solaris is missing, but i'm not the synth guy, as i do recording, mixing, mastering of REAL stuff ;-)
User avatar
pollux
Posts: 503
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: France

Post by pollux »

katano wrote:thanks brotha' man jimmy :-) solaris is missing, but i'm not the synth guy, as i do recording, mixing, mastering of REAL stuff ;-)
I'll go a bit OT here.. My apologies in advance.

I notice that you have both SPL TD and Attacker.

From what I could understand, Attacker is like a stripped down version of TD that only allows to change the attack of the sound but not the decay. Is that correct, or am I missing some point here?

Thx!
User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Post by katano »

yep, that's correct
User avatar
kylie
Rank-o-phile
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dresden / Germany

Post by kylie »

roman, do the strings for the double entries really differ?

I kinda doubt that, but I have a possible explanation:

- you had 4.0 before
- you did not change your setup or reinstall scope
- you got a new keyfile for 4.5 and imported that when using one of the new devices for the first time

the additional devices with a single entry may have been activated with the challenge response mechanism, thus only one line for them.

when I got keyfiles from ralf for 4.5, I also noticed that some entries are listed twice, but the license string is exactly the same.

with a new keyfile the date string also changed. maybe the license information is the same in your .rgy, but the date differs...?!

-greetings, markus-
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Post by katano »

thanks

yep, they really differ, even though it's only one or two characters. the date isn't the same, you're right on that... but maybe there's the date of purchase coded in the key, that would explain the difference in the key...
User avatar
kylie
Rank-o-phile
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dresden / Germany

Post by kylie »

I assume your doubles were licensed to the card before purchasing 4.5? but then, SBC is a double entry, too, and would, thus, not make sense to be there twice...
also the dynatube plugins make me think...
well you maybe right with your "date-coded-into-the-key" assumption.
I will check my old files when I'm back home. this is getting interesting... :)
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
Strattosphere
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Post by Strattosphere »

Hi

In the old key scheme the keys were 12 characters long. The same 12 character keys are now buried in the new keys file from the second character to the 13th, so for example my Pulsar 2.0 key used to be 3CWxxxxxCA60, but now it''s:-

03CWxxxxxCA60D6YJRICIYRR6CEYJRCCIYRR6CEYJRIG7UM

(I don't suppose it really matters but I replaced some of the characters with x's here)

I had multiple keys for the same components too when I installed Scope but if I export the registry from Scope I get no duplicates.

Regards

Stratt
User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Post by katano »

Strattosphere wrote:Hi

In the old key scheme the keys were 12 characters long. The same 12 character keys are now buried in the new keys file from the second character to the 13th, so for example my Pulsar 2.0 key used to be 3CWxxxxxCA60, but now it''s:-

03CWxxxxxCA60D6YJRICIYRR6CEYJRCCIYRR6CEYJRIG7UM

(I don't suppose it really matters but I replaced some of the characters with x's here)

I had multiple keys for the same components too when I installed Scope but if I export the registry from Scope I get no duplicates.

Regards

Stratt
ok, thanks... will try to export the keys and look what happens then

even though, my keys are already in the long term i think, here's an example:

0GTAL0ZYAKTA2D3F5Y6R6FYYJRCF5R2R6FYYJRCF5Yxxxxx
0GTAL0ZYAKTA2D4F5Y6R6FYYJRCF5R2R6FYYJRCF5Yxxxxx
Strattosphere
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Post by Strattosphere »

Hi

The important part of your key would be the part in red.

0GTAL0ZYAKTA2D3F5Y6R6FYYJRCF5R2R6FYYJRCF5Yxxxxx

If you look at your registry in the Scope software you'll see that only the red part is present.

Regards

Stratt
Post Reply