Timeworks scope vs native?

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Hangee_77
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Hanjaya Chandra

Timeworks scope vs native?

Post by Hangee_77 »

I would like to buy some Sonic Timeworks plugins and I noticed that the scope versions are more expensive than the native versions.
Sound wise, is there any different between the 2 versions?

hc.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7684
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

Yes but the Scope versions are also a bit old now. They work fine except for 1 particular bug that I forget atm.
User avatar
bill3107
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Europe

Post by bill3107 »

well, the P100/a100 reverb is a must-have ! The other plugins are rather "old" and were built by another developper... I loved the 4080L but recent plugins sounds so good now i would focus my attention on more recent stuff. Furthermore STW is not an "alive" 3rd party (their support is not very reactive to me) so i would only go for the P100/A100 if you have second generation boards (no 4 dsp, and boards manufactured let say, approx, after 2001).

As for the native vs dsp version, i remember Martin (the developper, who seems to prepare something new ? :wink: ) told me that the dsp version could be better thanks to dsp technology. Actually i am not an expert, but dsp architecture allows what a CPU cannot afford ... so be sure the dsp verion is better ! :wink:

Hope it helps !

Jo
MD69
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: France

Post by MD69 »

Hi,

Nice to hear they'll do new plugin. I hope they will be XTC compatibles. Their sharc channel strip sounded so good to me, but was not XTC compatible!
P100 is better than CSR and it have a chorus/delay worth the asked price. A100 use quite a lot of PCI channel.

Cheers

Michel
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23380
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

life in scope mode is good. we have the best. :wink:
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

I can only speak for my own subjective opinion.

I compared CSR and the scope versions and I prefered that scope reverb version.

The P100 sounded more spacious and cleaner with longer tails.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7684
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

Btw when I was referring to 'a bit old' I was thinking of everything BUT Warp's reverb devices. They seem to be excellent from every single comment I've ever heard here, not that the other Sonic Timeworks stuff isn't.

What I recalled was some specific settings related bug with the eq that I don't remember the particulars on, and I think the eq/timeworks reverb and channel strip still have the old presetting system?

One of these days I need to get the P100/A100 myself :)
User avatar
wayne
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Australia

Post by wayne »

Warp reverbs - jus' like butter :)
Post Reply