PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

I am particularly interested in good Lo/Hi pass filters.

I have been using Wolf's Spectrum EQ lately and must say its delicious.Sweep sounds like a Neve.

What are your opinions on the current EQs/Filters for Scope?
How do they differ?
How and why do you favour one over the other?
Does anyone use "built in" EQs for Pulsar?

Thanks for your views

I like the ones that sound good!!!

Flexor filters are definitly good sounding. I use the EQ on the stm2448! spacef has some nice filters as well.

I also like the Tubefilter (check the devices forum).

I use Interpole on several Prowave presets ( Insert FX rack ), as I can do some really nice filtering and specaial LFO treatments.

For EQ'ing I have had a great new friend from DAS. The mid / side DynaPara.

I initially used it on sampled content only, where it added such presence and control to libraries where I thought improvement was needed. But it seems as though the separation of the " psuedo " dual signals in the CW B2003's Leslie emulation needed a little push. Fuckin' A,....DynaPara can seperate frequencies on the mid and side chain so effectively, I actually thought I had two signals coming from the B2003.

I would love to use Wolf's Spectrum, and will add that to my purchase from him of the 32 channel mixer, and Kompressor when they become available.

I liked the way you described the sweeping abilities of a Neve counsel. I was fortunate enough to record w/ one in Lake Tahoe. Donna Summer sold her mountain top Castle, literally, and had an amazing studio included in it, w/ a Neve VR 60. I really miss that console and engineer. We used those shoebox sizes 1GB HDD's w/ ProTools 1.0 back then. Back when Macs actually ruled. The console sounded so sweet, and needed very little outboard gear, other than a 2" 2 track Otari, and several ADAT's from Alesis.