Brainworx bx_digital

Music Manic · Post by **Music Manic** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:14 am

What's you're views on it guys?
Does it offer anything new or exceptional.
Does it sound better than VST plugin?

Thanks

voidar · Post by **voidar** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:18 am

Because of the way Scope filters I would guess it might sound somewhat different from the VST version.

bill3107 · Post by **bill3107** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:21 am

i have tested the demo version (there was a contest), and i would say that this tool is incredible ! It takes time to handle the beat but for sure this plugin add magic as you can give THE sound to your mixes. I would say that IMHO it is more subtle than Optimaster when it comes to mastering. Furthermore, it is very different technically... A "must have" for sure. I do not have enough money this month ; otherwise this would be probably my choice with SPL TD...

Jo

katano · Post by **katano** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:24 am

the main difference between the vst and the scope version is that the scope version offers insert slots. this will never be possible with the vst version, dirk told me.

on the other hand, you have the link button and the mono-mode on the vst version which is not implemented on scope...

soundwise, i like the eq and deesser response much more on scope.

and i agree, it's a must have for mastering on scope!!

greez
roman

firubbi · Post by **firubbi** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:19 am

sft one is more musical.

Music Manic · Post by **Music Manic** » Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:16 am

firubbi wrote:sft one is more musical.

Do you mean SFP one for Pulsar?

Thanks

siriusbliss · Post by **siriusbliss** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:42 pm

It's an awesome tool for final mix.
VERY easy to use.

Greg

Music Manic · Post by **Music Manic** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:22 pm

On it for 10 mins and it's balanced everything.Very nice.
Will read manual now.