On 2005-12-01 05:15, TripACT wrote:
...I didnt "start" anything and i'm not childerish. ...
...Astroman may not like me but he should not have used those words he used. ...
well, the first point has already been mentioned and it was that expression
Hmm...WHAT?! What are they talking about!? What ?!
that made me add those two sarcastic comments.
I wouldn't consider the first one offensive at all and a 'f*ck*ng card' isn't personal either. Dunno how you can feel 'attacked'...
anyway, the 2nd point is bare nonsense - I do not even know you and surely would appreciate an opinion different from my own much more than a confirmation. It makes thing more interesting.
- your points
/ my points
- GUI Optimizations (Performance wise)
/ impossible as they don't own wxwidgets (the gui lib)
- Rewrite Multiclient ASIO drivers.
/ according to what has been explained here there are NO such drivers at all in the context* it's usually requested.
* means asio1+2 cubase, asio 3+4 logic, asio 4+5 soundforge or whatever
- WinXP 64 bit edition drivers.
/ a questionable advantage for Sonar users (?), but else ?
- BUG: Sometimes scope dissapears when opened with other applications
/ could be the OS as well, couldn't it ?
- Enhance sfp menus (everytime you close the project it asks you if you wish to save, even if you hanvt done anything in the project...pretty annoying when restarting the machine).
/ I agree with the annoyance factor and the senseless dialog, but it's not exactly in the way of something
- Can suerly add the 96Khz issue ppl above mentioned.
/ agreed, the system does not qualify for 96k when driven to the max with arbitrary project setup and complexity.
You cannot have all simultaneously, but that's the case in pretty much every system.
Yet the soundquality doesn't exactly suffer in SFP's 'regular' processing and it's possible to include task-dependant 96k data.
On a Luna it's nonsense (except write it to disk)
- Poor OSX users, still waiting for a driver.
/ they don't wait for a driver, but for a port of the application. In the meantime (of the waiting) Apple has released 3 different versions of OSX...
There are other companies as well who have a painful lack of Mac OSX developers.
- BUG: BSOD when when playing & stopping a movie with AC3 content thru S/PDIF (tested on winxp/2k on different machines - scope.sys issue).
/ if this is a core application for a $1k audio processing card then I've missed something. OK, no sarcasm - but even if Windows tells you it happened in Scope.sys that does not mean the bug (if any) has the same location. The movie player reading the drive could just mess the packets and 'boom' scope.sys crashes.
- WDM Driver - There are two more internal releases of that driver that try to solve the clicks occur during a playback of short wav files in windows. When this will be solved?
/ again I do not consider this a core feature of a studio card, but I respect your wish to have the feature.
the question in such situations (for the releasing company) is: will it pay back the effort ? Will we sell more cards ? Does it keep business profitable ? Can we afford it ?
- One more thing, A Situation i had myself with my PDA device. Had Microsoft ActiveSync installed, and for some reason one of scope DLLs in the win sys folder was overwritten with the Activesync one and caused problems.
/ better don't ask about my opinion about ANY quality issues of M$Software or Win in particular...
you do not want to blame Scope for being the victim of Activesync ?
honestly, there are points to improve, but showstoppers ?
cheers, Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2005-12-01 06:12 ]</font>