B2003 Vs NI B4

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
pseudojazzer
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: london

Post by pseudojazzer »

Anyone tried both? I've recently had to reinstall windows and my B4 vst is not working - looks like i've got to get a new one. Dunno whether to go for the scope or the NI version. it would be nice if Creamware would produce an outboard option like the tonebar controller that NI do? Maybe that should be released with their new ASB kit in may?
Cheers
wolf
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg
Contact:

Post by wolf »

although this is always an opinion, the b2003 sounds far more organic and deeper than the b4 .. at least to my ears.
I always found the b4 not suitable for my needs, either it's screaming too much and has to less lows or it doesn't sit well in the mix. I never had that problem with the b2003.
Cw even listened to my advice making the lesslie rotor better (means not only a tremolo like I believe the b4 still uses, but I could be wrong with that).

A tip for those, who already have it and my MidiToolBox:
Connect the MultiControl to the sliders/bars, so that each has its own controller and setting. Now you can morph between different settings for the bars/sliders and will get out phantastic soundmorphings. The evb3 from emagic has a morph knob built in and turning it makes a lot of fun :wink:

cheers
Wolfgang
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

listen to some original vintage recording of a B3 - those are usually not sooo great (the records...)
the B4 comes pretty close to that picture.

in comparison the B2003 is like you're standing next to that vintage organ when the record session took place :grin:

it's easy to compare the 2 emulations due to identical presets (drawbar settings) - I can only agree to Wolf's opinion.
The effect is VERY obvious if one A/Bs the B4 versus B2003. I have both ... and noone wants to buy the NI version :sad:

the B2003 also is a phantastic Leslie, Chorus Vibrato and Tube distortion FX box, in fact that was the main reason for me to get it :wink:

cheers, Tom
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

the B2003 also is a phantastic Leslie, Chorus Vibrato and Tube distortion FX box, in fact that was the main reason for me to get it
Same here, i love using it for M-Tron and vocals, anything to add grunge, Leslie etc. i even created a bank for B2003 for just signal processing here.
pseudojazzer
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: london

Post by pseudojazzer »

Sounds like i'll be after a B2003 then...
the leslie has got to be the most important thing!!
Cheers
spoimala
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by spoimala »

it's easy to compare the 2 emulations due to identical presets (drawbar settings)
Really? 100% similar preset lists? Brave move I'd say :smile:
So, there's "Green onions" in B2003. Can you do me a sample with that preset? And "Purple".
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

not as brave as your use of similiar - 100% similiar isn't that precise, is it ?
similiar explicitely includes a difference, else it would be replaced by identical... :wink:

anyway, I don't see a problem to move the drawbars to identical positions on both instruments, as a startpoint for comparison.
The final sound will vary due to different amp/fx emulation and of course the basic sound engine.
You'll probably hear the typical high mids of NI's Reactor engine, too.

The difference between the 2 emulations is so impressive that it doesn't need much tweaking anyway. It's up to personal taste which version is preferred, but who doesn't notice the difference definetely has a problem with his or her ears :wink:

cheers, Tom
Post Reply