New Synth: U Flo

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

Shayne White
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Shayne White »

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .zip"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: Synth<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Requires: Scope 4.0<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> This is my first (and probably last) synth for Scope. At first glance it doesn't look too exciting, but it has some nifty features:

* It has three UKnow oscillators. Suprisingly, they take up very little DSP (and sound pretty good, too). They can all be either Master sync or Slave sync. When the oscillator is set to slave, you can choose from one of the other two oscillators as the sync source. Don't worry about "sync feedback" -- it isn't possible. :smile:

* It has a little enhancing EQ built into the device -- I lightly enhanced the highs and the bass.

* It has a 2-pole filter, very sharp and crisp. It was the fattest one I could find -- I miss the Pro-One filter! :smile:

* Almost all the knobs are smooth, allowing you to do any kind of crazy modulation via an external Modular patch. Works great! Of course, to do that you'll need the Val Monitor+ module which you can download here:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 8&forum=16

* Since it's low DSP, you can get pretty high polyphony.

* Controllers 1, 7, 71, and 74 are built into the device, allowing you to do pitch modulation, main volume, resonance, and filter cutoff respectively. If you don't hear anything after selecting a preset, which may happen, try wiggling the main volume or the filter cutoff knob.

* It's free!!

Have fun!

Shayne

_________________
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com

Indieanna: Integrated Solutions for the Independent Musician
http://www.indieanna.com

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shayne White on 2005-05-08 12:27 ]</font><BR><BR><a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/devices/U_Flo.jpg" BORDER="0">
JLS
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Post by JLS »

nice synth

low dsp usage

very thanks :smile:


p.s

smooth all knobs - it is fantastic for external modulation ( im tested flexor value and step sequncer module ) GREAT

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: megerov on 2004-12-03 15:53 ]</font>
hubird

Post by hubird »

thanks Shayne :smile:
looks like a take-it-and-blow-it-away synth :grin:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2004-12-03 18:15 ]</font>
Joxer the Mighty
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Joxer the Mighty »

Thanks Shayne! But with is this going to be your last?
Plato
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Plato »

Ahoy Shayne!
This I like - simple, but fulfilling to use - thanks very much.
Don't suppose there's any chance of adding a mono-legato mode for glide-tastic wickedness is there?
Shayne White
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Shayne White »

I'm glad you all like it! No, I wanted keep this synth as basic as possible -- no bells or whistles, for lowest DSP. There are plenty of other synths that feature legato mode. :smile:

I don't think I'll do any other synths because I think everything's been covered already! There isn't much more we can use in the SDK!! :sad:

Shayne
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com

Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
Plato
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Plato »

Oh, go on, mate - it'd sound fantastic
Lima
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Lima »

Idea For Shayne (or for anyone will try to do):
What do you think about making a "serious" additive synth? :wink:

About "serious": Detunable harmonics, each harmo has his own amp-eg (if eg = loopable then eg := great :wink: ).
About the number of harmo: I think it's a good idea to make it user configurable (for example: from 4 to 64) due to optimize the patch.

About the filter you can put 2 multimode filter (one for each stereo channel) immediately before the out.

Some other features could be 2 separate eg and 2 LFO for the filers.

Effects are not required, because there are tons of fantastc effects available nowadays.

This makes the synth quite simple to do in my opinion.

I know that's possible to do it with modular, but the modulars aren't optimized and more difficult to program because the interface is more confused.

Some other opinions/ideas/suggeastions?
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

On 2004-12-07 13:11, Lima wrote:
the modulars aren't optimized and more difficult to program because the interface is more confused.
Are you really shure, you know, what you are talking about?
symbiote
Posts: 781
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by symbiote »

On 2004-12-07 16:54, Immanuel wrote:
On 2004-12-07 13:11, Lima wrote:
the modulars aren't optimized and more difficult to program because the interface is more confused.
Are you really shure, you know, what you are talking about?
Well, he's kind of right, 64 sine osc + EG would be pretty confusing to edit in Modular :razz:

Few more ideas: stereo additive synth, with independent/semi-independent partials for left and right channels; group editing of some parameters (otherwise programming stuff will take forever); and how about a bit of additive + fm to drive the cats crazy :razz:.

Haven't try UFlo yet tho :sad: I will as soon as I can physically pry myself from that evul, evul SDK.
Lima
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Lima »

Pretty sure:
I've got modular1 (the one free for everyone) and if i want to do the synth I told before, I've got the following troubles:

I can use some sine oscillators (cheapest on Dsp resource) but they aren't tunable in harmonic relations in a easy way: I need to set the coarse and then finetutning to reach (for example) the 3rd harmonic. And I have to do this for each harmo. If I want to build a sound with 20 harmonics, like the 8' the 4' the 2_2/3' etc... the work is a lot.

Then I need to merge all this sources, and to do this I need a mixer, but the mixer has only 4 inputs, so returnig to the example of the 20 harmonics, i need 5+2+1 =8 mixers.

So my patch has got, at least (for the ex. of the 20 harmonics), 20 oscillators with 20 loopable egs, 8 mixers, 2 filters, 2 lfos, 2 eg and the standard midi, ins-outs, vca, esync modules... Do you imagine how the hell of cables? And the dimension on screen of the patch? It isn't very handy to program in my opinion.

Another thing: if I want a patch with only 6 harmonics, I can set the volume of the other 14 osc to 0, but my patch will be as heavy for the Dsp as the one before.
So I need a different modular for each number of harmonics I need... :sad:

About the optimization: I've made recently a very simple synth on modular 1 wich has a multimodal oscillator, 1 amp-eg and 1 Uknow filter. Each of these are controlled from both a lfo and an envelope.
Well I can do at most 4 voices and the mdl file is about 1 mb.

At the same time the miniscope is about 700 kb large, but it has 3 oscillators + noise generator + 8 lfo ecc...
And I've a polphony of 12 Voices! :wink:

I don't know the new modular versions; surely they have a lot of new and exciting modules (I'm thinking of buying the mod III for Christmas)and probably they are less Dsp hungry, but how much?
Shayne White
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Shayne White »

I think the DSP usage for a 64+ osc additive synth would be gigantic. You're better off with a CPU synth there.

If I'm wrong, someone correct me!!

Shayne

Edit: I just tried inserting 64 sine oscillators, plus a couple of other necessities to see how much DSP it would use. A hefty amount, but not completely unworkable (as long as you have a Scope Professional card!). Well, maybe I'll think about it...it's an interesting idea.

Don't forget to check out VirSyn's Tera synth in the meantime! :wink:

_________________
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com

Indieanna: Integrated Solutions for the Independent Musician
http://www.indieanna.com

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shayne White on 2004-12-08 00:44 ]</font>
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Lima, have you tried Flexor's shapers? 4SinOct and 4TriOct make 4 extra octaves for the respective waveforms, and there's other harmonic shapers are way more flexible.

Another simple trick: add an octave for a sine wave by ringmodding it.

There's little chance that these are the only ways of making more harmonics in a dsp-ecoonomic way.

This far, I think the record here at z is set by a 16 osc device, Neutron7's 16Saw (or Saw16?) modular patch. But as you read now, there's other tricks to simulate more oscillators :smile:
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
JLS
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Post by JLS »

more info about dsp save is on http://www.adern.com Tip&Trick forum thread. ( RampDivider PhaseMod ....)

:smile:
Lima
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Lima »

Uh, ok :smile:
Probably my idea of a great dsp-saving using the sdk is wrong.

@shayne: thanks a lot to have tried :smile: I'll not forget to check the tera, and the k5000s of a friend :wink: (And about an additive synth with 24 or 32 harmonics? It's still gigantic?)

@ath0mjc: no, I haven't got Flexor. Christmas is arriving, and I'm planning to buy the ModIII, the Flexor will be the next one. Or could I use Flexor without the ModII/III?
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

Wow! Thanks Shayne :smile:

Will check it out soon...

I do have one question - if you set one of the oscs to be a master, but synch it to another (and enable the synch button) what effect would this have (if any)?

Royston
User avatar
cannonball
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: italia

Post by cannonball »

hi

thankz shayne great works and synth
:grin:

ale
spiderman
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: the web indeed !!

Post by spiderman »

"I think the DSP usage for a 64+ osc additive synth would be gigantic. You're better off with a CPU synth there."

strange ?? my old K2000 can manage 96 osc with 96 amp eg and 96 pitch eg without any problem .
I'm sure there is a way to optimize this well ! i do analyse /resynthese with my K2000 but it's a pain in the ass to set up the EG . I think it could be possible to do a FFT analyse and then create the EG directly from the software ( a kind of EG table ) then import this table in the plug in
then after you could tweak the eg one by one . or import two eg table and then morph between the two etc ..
so yes i miss a additive synth !!
User avatar
alfonso
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fregene.
Contact:

Post by alfonso »

On 2004-12-08 10:38, spiderman wrote:
.... or import two eg table and then morph between the two etc ..
That exactly the way Addi8, Mod III stock CWA patch that came with SFP is conceived. It is quite a rich synth considering it's limited dimensions and dsp weight.
Mehdi_T
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: france
Contact:

Post by Mehdi_T »

This far, I think the record here at z is set by a 16 osc device, Neutron7's 16Saw (or Saw16?) modular patch. But as you read now, there's other tricks to simulate more oscillators :smile:
basically, 64 in BlackBox Oscillators, or actually an virtually unfinite number limited by your dsp.
plus more than 500 chords from piano, guitar and etchnic instruments.
all you have to do is to set the octave of each group of 8 oscillators (in the rack 8 for ex).
All kind of oscillators are available, from basic multi/uknow to waldorf wavetables and much more (and RD oscillators too if you wish). of course, you are not obliged to have the same oscillator on all layers : you can mix them, any of them, use phase mod or gated FM, quad morphing... and link them by groups of 3/5/8 if you wish, which are then tunable by the main oscillator slot(s) (synth or modular)... :wink:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mehdi_T on 2004-12-08 19:23 ]</font>
Post Reply