A Banal Question, But I'll Ask It Anyway

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Astral Fridge Magnet
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Astral Fridge Magnet »

Hello,
As the title says this is a banal question, but one I would really appreciate the answer to.
I have an Emagic AMT 8 MIDI Interface. What I would like to know is whether it is best to connect it via USB or via the COM Port?
Is there much difference in terms of performance? Is one better than the other? The COM Port would at least give me one more USB socket available.
Sorry it's not really Pulsar related, but your comments would really be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for your response(s)
siberiansun
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by siberiansun »

on the other hand, if you're not using USB for anything else, connecting to com would give you the possibility to disable USB in bios. for better overall performance.

if i'm over my head here please forgive my banal answer :wink:
fidox
Posts: 846
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Slovenia
Contact:

Post by fidox »

i would connect it over COM and disable USB if you don't use anything else thru USB...
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

The COM port can easily be driven fast enough to handle MIDI, so I'd agree with the other two chaps.

Royston
User avatar
dbmac
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by dbmac »

I don't understand the bad rap USB is getting around here. As long as the USB controllers aren't sharing IRQ with any PCI devices, there's no problem with using USB, 1 or 2.
I've got an SX dongle and midi keyboard (USB1) and a DVDRW drive (USB2) and two Scope boards (was well as a SCSI PCI card) all playing together just fine. My system is ACPI.

/dave
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

I wasn't rapping USB - I use about eight USB devices simultaneously no problem on my DAW.

I suggested using the COM port for the MIDI device because a) the port can handle it and b) doing that frees up a USB port which can then be used for something else (probably somehting that the COM port couldn't handle).

I will still bitch about USB 2, though :wink:

Royston
Astral Fridge Magnet
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Astral Fridge Magnet »

Thanks for the replies so far.
However, I need the USB ports for my dongles and only my dongles. So I assume I can't disable USB in Bios because I would need them for Logic and Cubase.
wolf
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg
Contact:

Post by wolf »

I've made some tests with 8 stacked unitors/amt connected via usb and com on win98/2k some time ago.
The tests were about timing differences between the different ports (in total 64).
It was done with logic 4.8, the chance is high, that the results are only true for this app (and later versions).
One result was, that midi notes have more priority over controllers (ok, that's obvious). Another result was, that usb looses timing much faster then the com port, especially regarding controller messages.

best
Wolfgang

_________________
<a href="http://www.worldless.com/sfp">wolf audio design</a>
<a href="http://www.worldless.com">worldless productions</a>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: wolf on 2004-05-27 12:43 ]</font>
siberiansun
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by siberiansun »

I've got an SX dongle and midi keyboard (USB1) and a DVDRW drive (USB2) and two Scope boards (was well as a SCSI PCI card) all playing together just fine. My system is ACPI.
/dave
that's great dave. however your system specs doesn't apply to everyone, on some systems USB2 may be a performance hog.
my suggestion was of the "better be safe than sorry" -kind.

USB2 IS known to cause troubles on some setups.
Post Reply