anyone here have 4 cards connected ? i have one free pci slot and irq, so if i can make this 4 plugg STDM cable is there any hope for me ?
i think there's no hope for me, since i discovered Creamware, now i can't stop !?!:))
Doesn't the manual actually say something along the lines of three cards maximum through a single STDM cable?
Still, I think two computers connected via ADAT makes more sense. That's what I hope to try next. (As soon as I figure out a good way for quieting the fans in the box that will live in my listening room ).
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jabney on 2004-02-12 14:38 ]</font>
Grrrmpf.
believed in rumors....
4 boards in my computer: Luna, P1, P1, Psrb...
=> Errormessage about s-tdm connection.
used a custom s-tdm - just plugged another connector in a 3connector-version. The new one seems to be finde - everything's o.k. with three boards, no matter which connectors I use, but no 4 boards. schluchz!
Is it really impossible? There has to be a trick or something ...!?
I know that most dsp card makers advertise a limit of 3 boards (my RME hammerfall has a maximum limit of 3 pci devices as well). I think its a limitation of the i/o architecture (PCI/IRQ/etc) and not something that can be fixed by the card makers, only the people who drive computer technology.
An interesting question though is whether PCI-Express and the forthcoming new BIOS replacements have the same limitations.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: valis on 2004-02-21 09:25 ]</font>
I read somewhere on the Creamware site that 3 cards is a maximum, but they say to contact them if you want to run more than 3. So I don't think it's a PCI limitation, rather a software (drivers?) limitation. Probably cos more cards are a torture for your motherboard. Also an STDM cable (as I know it) can only connect 3 cards.
As for most users, getting larger cards would solve the issue, IMO it doesnt make any sense to cascade 4 Pulsar2's. It's time to move to Scope boards then... As to my experience, larger boards also make a much more stable setup than different smaller ones.
Hi!
For selling all my boards (19DSP)3 Pulsar I, Luna, PI srb I wouldn't get enough money to buy a scope (15DSP) with less IO capabilities.
For sure, the 2 computer-solution fits best for me. I have to get that second one quiet somehow (it's kind of a high-end Instrument player and data server right now - I think i'll take out a big, loud HD and use it only for minimax & effects now).
I had Scope SRB, Pulsar1 and Powersampler in one PC. I found, that I ran out of STDM connections too often. After I took out the Powersampler, I can load more devices.
Isn't there a PCI bandwidth issue also? As in: the computer can run out of PCI bandwidth before all the Pulsar DSP's are used (this presuming that one has....15 or more (?) SHARCs?
I have had PCI trouble with a 4dsp card. You need a motherboard with good PCI performance (and bandwith does not seem to be as much the actual problem, as timing does).