Page 12 of 13

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:18 am
by Casper
Spirit, youve won the Image!

cheers,

Casper

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:23 am
by Casper
Maybe 200 years is a bit to far back.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:30 am
by Casper
I think the story of today began with
this man : Image

While this man's family funded the above man.
Image

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:41 am
by Casper
This man: Image deared to speak of "A new world order" too. Very strange since Hitler was saying the same damm thing. And burned the Reichstag Building to enforce fear on all people and so gaining more power since the people wanted to feel secure.

See the connection between 911 and that day in Germany? It's the Hegelian princeple.

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 9:06 am
by Casper
what's the star of David meant to imply ?

"Mason"

As in Masonry:

WHAT IS FREEMASONRY?

Freemasonry, or Masonry, is the oldest and largest fraternal organization in the world, a universal society of friends who seek to become better men through their association with one another and their families. It is a 600-year-old fraternity with a 3, 000-year tradition, the prototype of most modern fraternal societies and service organizations.

In a society whose moral values are being severely tested, Masonry brings men together for fellowship and the promotion of integrity and good citizenship.

Masonry requires a belief in God and urges its members to be faithful to their own religious beliefs, but it is not a religion.

It encourages its members and their families to be good citizens and to choose their own best means of political expression, but it is not a political organization.

Its charitable activities and good works are for the benefit of all humankind, but it is not a benefit society or welfare institution.


So maybe Spirit it is even more that 200 years old :wink:

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 2:10 pm
by Casper

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 2:15 pm
by Casper

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 2:21 pm
by Casper

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 4:40 pm
by spoimala
Okay, CAsper & others, I guess it's time to reveal the truth:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/ ... append.gif

Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 11:14 am
by Casper
well, I guess people just don't care.
Until one realy feels it in there wallet.
Or worse, start loosing family and so on.

Well see! I hope it won't.
Just be on the lookout for hegelian principle in action.

Most of the "truth" is already here.

See ya around!

Casper

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:48 pm
by Casper
Again!?

Yes , again.

A House bill has been introduced that would change the 22nd amendment and enable George Bush to remain President for the rest of his political life. The bill would repeal limitations on a President holding office for a maximum of two terms.

@#$%?
Slowely but sureley.......

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:48 am
by doodyrh

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:01 am
by Casper
:roll: Is that the best you can do?

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:40 am
by Casper
Just for the record.

London Boms Debate:

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... rum=31&172

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 3:24 am
by Casper
Discovery channel is now repeating it's programm: "How the twintowers collapsed"

I now watched it three times.
What unrealistic views are presented here.
Little tests that just proove nothing!
Things about fireproofing material being unsufficiently put on the steel colloms.

Than tell me this: Where is the symatricy in all this. After all it came straight down.
Why did'nt it fall sideways? (one of these little tests infact proove it falls sideways)

Then they start talking about how the floors where attatched to the ext colloms. And how it slowly twisted (in some places)because of the fires.

Let me ask you this: How is it possible that the four corner-colloms of the buildings gave away exactly on the same time ?

What are these pufs of smoke that appear each about 10 stories appart when the towers collapse ? All looking similar to eachother?

Sorry Discovery channel , I just think your full of propaganda. Beginning a documantary with the sentence "There's no doubt that these were terrorist atacks"
It just doesn't add to a story that wants to explain why the towers collapsed.

Free Mason's , I hope you fall someday like these twintowers did.
BTW , where is all that gold that was stored below?

PEACE!

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:08 am
by Casper
For the Dutch ,

http://tweevandaag.nl/index.php?module= ... &sid=29834#

kijk maar goed!

For the long versions of the two intervieuws:
Andreas von Bülow:
http://tweevandaag.nl/index.php?module= ... 38&cid=211

Michael Meacher:
http://tweevandaag.nl/index.php?module= ... 37&cid=211

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:54 pm
by Casper
Then search more.... I think quantity matters now. So watch some more, and find out what realy happend.
There is so much of the same to find, coincedence?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:00 am
by Casper
Ask the fair question: Who gained (most).

Never ever has a steel building collapsed from fire, so why building 7 ? (record is 6 days of fire ,the steal constuction left standing)

It are these simple but very meaningfull questions. Not one of these awnsers you'd find would convince you , but a whole bunch of these ,like a good investigation would have, could.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:17 am
by Spirit
OK Casper, I'll bite.

What I'd really like to hear is a short and simple explanation of your view of what happened. I don't want to wade through half a dozen links to weirdo conspiracy sites. If the case is so strong and obvious then let's hear it.

From what I've gathered from your posts so far it seems you believe that the US government plotted the whole thing. They installed demolition charges to bring down the buildings. They also stole the pot of gold under the towers. The entire thing was staged to hasten the introduction of a fascist state and as cover for an imperialist war in the Middle East to secure oil and make corporate government buddies rich.

Am I close ?

What I can't see fitting in so well is the role of the Saudi hijackers, and the boasting of Osama about his involvement.

Also is 9/11 then the only 'fake' attack, or are some or all of the others fake as well ? For example, the attacks in Bali, Tanzania and London ?

The whole conpiracy idea seems incredibly far-fteched to me, but if there really is a coherant alternate explanation that can be logically stated then I'd love to hear it.

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:29 am
by garyb
saudis are in the pockets of the globalists who put them in power(remember the pictures of bush holding hands with a prince?). the bin ladens work for the USA. al-caeda is a cia/mi6 front. the documentation is too extensive for a quick post here. if you pm me, i'll arrange to send you proof, which does exist in the regular media.