that's correct Astro, I just mentioned the top five of the test, to show us on planetz some best-of to choose from.
To inform you guys:
The authors of the test explain they didn't test with electronic test gear, instead they made a 'subjective' but very systemized listening test, with several types of source material and with several people, comparing all the tested models.
They gave judgements about the Hi, Mid, Low, the "Aufloesung" (performance?, Astro, translation please

), Stereo performance and Total impression, where the last could deviate from the average of the former test parameters.
I liked the 'musical' approach of the test, the 'subjective' approach gave me more information than a 'objective' test could have done
I did a listening test in a shop, with special attention to the Mackies, the Genelecs and the Adams.
I agreed to the test results.
About the well known and proved Genelecs and the new Adams: they were very, very identical considering the frequencies balance and overall performance, but switching between them was an amazing experience.
The reason for the unbelievable open sound and precise definition lays in the special tweeters which can produce frequencies up to 32 Khz, unhearable, but this overcapacity works very well.
For who's interested in the technics behind the tweeters, I like to quote from de Adam website:
The A.R.T. (=Accelerated Ribbon Technology) tweeters and midrange units take a completely new approach in kinematics to move air and improve the quality of music reproduction.
Based on the original works of Dr. Oskar Heil, who invented his "Air Motion Transformer" back in 1972, new electroacoustic transducers have been developed that are based on improved layouts and new materials. The membrane consists of a lamella like folded diaphragm whose single folds move according to the alternate current, thus squeezing air in and out. All other loudspeaker drive units, whether they are voice coil driven, electrostatics, piezos or magnetostatics, act like a piston, moving air in a 1:1 ratio. This is undesirable, as the specific weight of air is much lower than that of the driving mechanics.
Speaking in terms of electrical Engineering one could say there is a bad match between source and load. The A.R.T. principle achieves a 4:1 velocity transformation between driving diaphragm and driven air, i. e. the air moves in and out four times faster than the folds itself are moving. This superior "motor" is responsible for the enormous clarity and transient reproduction that is to be heard from the A.R.T. drive units.
[end].
Yes, I like my Adams

I hope I didn't bother you.
check out an image here:
http://www.adam-audio.de/technology/e_tech01_start.htm
_________________
Let There Be Music!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2003-04-15 00:23 ]</font>