here u r....Ready for press?

Showcase for musicians using Scope in their music. Only the 75 most recent music files are online. Older files expire off the server.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Liquid EDGE
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Brighton England
Contact:

Post by Liquid EDGE »

This file has expired and is no longer available here. The owner of the topic can re-upload the file, or post a link to an off-site file. <BR><BR><a name="planetz-tag"></a>Genre: Drum & Bass<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Uses: Pulsar Mixers<BR> copyright © mutationrecords<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> i'd like to know if people feel this is ready for pressing? we plan to get the ball rolling in a month, so that stuff will b ready by feb 05..the track will be coupled with audio whore.. presenting a double a side single .

some people may recognise this already .. but it's been slightly reworked.. Had Female vocals added which i believe sound v nice and well, make the Tune as well as adding a whole new dimension to it..
also the track has been mastered..

thanks in advance for comments.
User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

nice tune mate! love the bass.

But to my preference i would add a bit more presence to the vocs from 2:33 and onwards.

keep up the good work!
hubird

Post by hubird »

very nice track, I remember the second bass part :smile:

A very few things though :smile:
I don't like the flanging/room on the voice, not cheap enough to me, I'd like to see a nice verb :smile:
I also don't like so much the added reverb effect on the bass before the 'break' somewhere, to cheap to me :grin:
Third, I'd have choosen a more brutal bass sound, to get more impact.
And maybe it 'd be nice to go back to the first bass part, to get it closer for a while, and to add some extra depth to the arrangement :smile:

Nice track anyway :smile:


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2004-11-03 21:29 ]</font>
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

really good. One point, it might depend on the power structure in you creative group.. If it's your name that's going to be up front, leave it as it is. If you want to promote the vocalist, bring out the vocals more.

but that's a minor marketing detail. I think it's done. If it were me, I hate to go back to fix these small things. hehe.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-11-05 02:39 ]</font>
User avatar
nprime
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada, eh?

Post by nprime »

brittle.

top end is way too hot for me.

No real bass energy...maybe club systems play back with a very different frequency response.

My ears get tired. Everything does not have to have extreme top end.

The music is very cool.

R
Liquid EDGE
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Brighton England
Contact:

Post by Liquid EDGE »

Cheers for the input guy's..

quite a mixed response then. but on the whole positive..

think i will give some of the pointers a go but as ken says it's a pain in the ass, but it was the reason of posting it.. to see if anyone could sugest improvements... they good ideas hubird, thanks...(well i was hoping for the thumbs up actually)..

think maybe i should bring the vocals forward a bit, cheers piddy, but with that said crytics were complaining that the new prodigy album had the vocals too quite.

nprime.. i'm supprised it sounds so brittle/toppy at your end, spose i should check the track out on some more systems. sounds good in cars and other systems i've tried. but hay.. The transfer of tunes is bloody anoying :smile:

Thanks again

_________________
Keep Rollin'

http://www.mutationrecords.co.uk



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Liquid EDGE on 2004-11-07 16:31 ]</font>
Post Reply