what resolution is STM2448 supposed to be optimized for?

krizrox · Post by **krizrox** » Sat May 22, 2004 7:47 am

I'm using 1280x1024 and the entire length of the mixer channels just fits from end to end on my 17" screen. I keep the master channel window underneath and a bit lower than the mixer section so I can click on that window and bring it forward when I need to.

I agree it's clunky.

And I still notice problems with the EQ section. When I pull up different EQ types (like low pass for example), the curve sometimes disappears. There is really somthing wrong with the EQ section. Anyone else seen that problem?

7XL · Post by **7XL** » Sat May 22, 2004 11:33 am

bassdude,

You can change your font and text size to what ever is comfrotable to you. At the resolutions that I run, I generally set them to about 140%.

Also where did you get these recommended sizes from? I'm just curious, because my Viewsonic 21" has a recommended size of 1600 x 1200.

bassdude · Post by **bassdude** » Sat May 22, 2004 5:58 pm

I could change the font size but then that is at the expense of screen real estate anyway so I don't bother. I'm pretty happy with the res as is because it's comfortable for me and I can still read the screen from a distance.

The recommended resolution is for my monitors which were originally used for unix workstations. The CDE desktop resolution was set to 1280 x 1024.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bassdude on 2004-05-22 19:05 ]</font>

King of Snake · Post by **King of Snake** » Mon May 24, 2004 6:17 am

I'm on 19" and I'm sort of undecided between 1280 x 1024 (or 1280x960) and 1600x1200. I like the screenspace the latter gives but it gets a bit too small at times for things that don't have adjustable font sizes, so 1280x1024 is really better suited to a 19". With a 21" I would definitely go for 1600x1200 though.

valis · Post by **valis** » Mon May 24, 2004 6:55 am

I use my 22" hitachi (crt) at 1600x1200 and can't complain about anything other than deskspace and power consumption.