Demo of a new reverb

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:22 am

Hey,

You're now able to test a new reverb.

Additional information :

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... forum=5&10

This is a very demanding reverb regarding PCI and DSP resources.

Cheers

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2004-01-06 10:25 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 01:10 ]

snoopy4ever · Post by **snoopy4ever** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:49 am

Hello Warp69..

Nice screen shots.., looks very professional.

Is that demo a time limited one?? like the ones that CW have?. Just curious on that.

Thanks.

ChrisWerner · Post by **ChrisWerner** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 11:07 am

It mutes periodically, no beeps.
I like the interface, the quality and the many parameters like long delays etc..
Nice verb indeed.

roberflas · Post by **roberflas** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 3:55 pm

Hello, I just try your reverb and sounds very good.
But i need more info abut it:
there is manuals and schematic routing?
what is the price?
where can i purchase?
Great work release on it go pulsar.
Best regards
Roberto

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 4:09 pm

Hey,

Some additional information.

Setup page :

When you use 'Mono' or 'Stereo' you free some DSP resources.

Diffusion Type :

You can switch between two different diffusions type - again to save some resources.

Reverb Type :

You can switch between the normal algorithm and a downsized algorithm which still sound close to the original algorithm. Again to preserve DSP/PCI resources.

Please remember that its only the plate algorithm, the ambience and random hall algorithm will follow soon.

Cheers

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 01:10 ]

roberflas · Post by **roberflas** » Tue Jan 06, 2004 4:19 pm

I hope that you finish your device soon it's really a good job. please letme know your progress with it i like to use it more soon in my projects.

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Wed Jan 07, 2004 5:32 pm

while I cannot really comment on the sound quality - I haven't enough of THAT quality stuff around

I really do like those interface rectangles with the small meter on the right and the big, clear number.

One of the most smooth, easy and fast approaches to a tweakable UI.

It does sound good, of course

- though after being tortured by the reverbs of some native (Mac) software (I'm testing in between) - it simply rules !

cheers, Tom

marcuspocus · Post by **marcuspocus** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 4:26 am

Yeah it sound great, too bad i don't have enough dsp, wouldn't be useable for projects for me...

Man, i want a powerpulsar...

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:45 am

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-01 08:59 ]

rodos1979 · Post by **rodos1979** » Mon Jan 19, 2004 5:51 pm

I ve just tried the demo... I cant say if it is a faithful reproduction of the PCM91 or not, since I dont own a real one. However, I found it very nice sounding! I really liked it!

But, sometimes its sound is distorted/clipped? Why is that?

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:38 pm

it's probably part of the demo limitation

Post by **hubird** » Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:01 pm

Warp69, the link to the presets page just shows me a data text page.
Do you have another link?
thanks

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:40 am

Hey,

Its very easy to get a distorted sound if you dont turn down the "Input Level" on the Main page. You should use -11.3dB to represent the volume of hardware reverbs.

You can right click on the link and choose "save target as". Let me know if it doesn't work, then I'll upload a zip file for you.

Kind regards

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2004-03-07 05:51 ]

Lemke · Post by **Lemke** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 6:34 am

Yesterday I've been testing Plate demo against real PCM90 (wich is the same as 91 except for ADA converters), hooked to Pulsar's SPDIF IO. The results to my ears are identical on both devices when loading identically named presets. It's great for those who love Lex PCM sound. I don't

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:15 pm

[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-01 08:59 ]

Lemke · Post by **Lemke** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:43 am

On 2004-01-21 12:15, Warp69 wrote:
Hi Lemke,

Its fair enough that you dont like the Lexicon PCM91 sound. But what reverbs do you prefer? 480L? TC6000? Quantec?

Im planning emulations of other reverbs, but I dont know which.

Kind regards

Wow! I cant believe it's true. If I'm asked I should propose Quantec QRS. To me it puts even 480L to shame.

[ This Message was edited by: Lemke on 2004-01-22 10:45 ]

gedas · Post by **gedas** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 12:23 pm

Another vote for Quantec! Quantec was initially on the third party developer list, But the Yarstick plugin never happened. It would be great to have something like this on SFP.

Gedas

scary808 · Post by **scary808** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 12:35 pm

On 2004-01-21 12:15, Warp69 wrote:
But what reverbs do you prefer? 480L? TC6000? Quantec?

A 480L & the TC6000 would be great too! An emulation of the PCM42 would be very cool if you feel like making a delay.

Lemke · Post by **Lemke** » Fri Jan 23, 2004 2:24 am

On 2004-01-22 10:43, Lemke wrote:
On 2004-01-21 12:15, Warp69 wrote:
Hi Lemke,

Its fair enough that you dont like the Lexicon PCM91 sound. But what reverbs do you prefer? 480L? TC6000? Quantec?

Im planning emulations of other reverbs, but I dont know which.

Kind regards

Wow! I cant believe it's true. If I'm asked I should propose Quantec QRS. To me it puts even 480L to shame.

[ This Message was edited by: Lemke on 2004-01-22 10:45 ]

I want to add more. Quantec QRS has only 1 (one) algorithm. So it will be possible to model the whole device in one step.

spacef · Post by **spacef** » Fri Jan 23, 2004 2:57 am

myself i would love a 60's 70's jamaican plate reverb (someone who know s better will cite the brands...). see peter tosh centenary compilation, for example, very distinctive.