Pulsar and headphones

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
doodyrh
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Neither here nor there.

Post by doodyrh »

Anyone have a nice (cheap) solution for this?

I have active monitors hanging off the analog out and would ideally like to hang some cans on the S/PDIF. But how, without a full-blown mixer?

Quality is not the main issue here. Just a way of silent monitoring when recording from mic.
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

usually a DAT recorder does the job, since you're only use it for monitoring it can have mechanical probs, which makes it even cheaper.
I'm using a Philips DCC (pre-DAT tape, $30-60 on eBay) for that purpose. It is in record standby mode for about a year now because I never switch it off :smile:
I can honestly suggest those units as very versatile with high quality analog outs, at least for this kind of use.

Mine is connected by coax S/PDIF to the digital master out of my mixer, while it's S/PDIF coax out goes to Roland DS30 monitors. The analog outs of the tape carry the same signal, which I once used to feed to a hifi unit.
I'm shure I'm sacrificing a little quality with this setup, compared to monitors connected directly to Pulsar, but it's much simpler to operate and lets me use the mixer independently from the PC.

cheers, Tom

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2003-07-17 09:03 ]</font>
hubird

Post by hubird »

if...your DAT offers 44.1 KHz, which most consumer DATs don't :smile:
a second problem is the master/slave issue, most consumer DATs claim to be the master if I'm right.
My Sony DAT, indeed mechanical dead, is one like that.
Coz my SPDIF out on the card is occupied by a Lexicon MPX1, and coz I have two Luna2496 breakouts, I'm still looking for some re-use of the DAT,
If someone likes to have it for free, come over and get it :smile:
aMo
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by aMo »

My Tascam DA-30MK2 does both 44.1 and 48khz, and needs to be Master during playback, and slave during recording/monitoring..

Works quite nice for a headphone amp.. heh

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: aMo on 2003-07-17 11:24 ]</font>
scary808
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Utah

Post by scary808 »

I use a Roland VS880 for headphones. Actually, thats all I use it for. You can get these pretty cheap because they made a lot of them.
doodyrh
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Neither here nor there.

Post by doodyrh »

Thanks for the ideas guys. :smile:

Is the master/slave issue really a problem?
aMo
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by aMo »

I once had my ADAT as Master while trying to record to it, there was some extreme crackling sounds, almost to the point of static noise, then my entire system crashed...

So it CAN be a problem in some cases yes..
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

doodyrh, as long as you only monitor through an S/PDIF device or even record, there are no problems to expect if the external unit supports your preferred sample rate.
It's automatically set to slave as the receiver.
But if you'd want to play back a tape digitally via S/PDIF there can be trouble, depending of the unit and the other SFP settings, specially with multiple digital connections. The regular S/PDIF standard assumes that the sending unit must be master.

cheers, Tom
aMo
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by aMo »

Image

This is actually a Mackie mixer, pretty good price, more info here: http://www.tapcogear.com/products/6306/index.html

Price is pretty good if you just use it to hook up monitors/headphones to Pulsar..
hubird

Post by hubird »

this is perfect!
exactly what I need, specially the 'Separate Phone and Control Room Level'.
2*phantom, balanced, nothing superfluous, if the quality is Mackie-like, this is perfect in any virtual studio, don't you think?
thanks for this one Amo :smile:

_________________
Let There Be Music!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2003-07-19 18:34 ]</font>
aMo
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by aMo »

No problem, I will be getting one myself I think :wink:

(Just as soon as I have a little money left over)
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

Tom

As I remember it, DCC came after DAT, but it never became a hit (like it usually happens when a compagny try to introduce a new format, that only works on their own equipment).



Hubird

I believe most consumer DATs actually do support 44.1. I have a very early Pioneer. I do not think it was the high-end back then, but it shure does 44.1.
aMo
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by aMo »

I believe that all DAT's can do 44.1Khz, since the DAT was introduced so people could record in the same quality as cd's when they were introduced...

It never became a commercial hit though..
But studio-people liked it, so it survived..
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

Actually DAT was introduced with 48KHz, so that HiFi nerds could feel, that they where recording in higher quality than CDs. LPs where still considdered the most accurate media back then (to some it is still).
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
scary808
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Utah

Post by scary808 »

I believe the reason for making DAT 48k originally was to prevent digital copies of CDs.
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

Oh yes :smile: that too :grin:
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

thanks for your info, Immanuel :smile:
I assumed it was older because it can play back regular cassette tapes as well.
But with it's 18-bit converters and syncing to anything from 32-48 khz, a decent phone amp plus line in/outs it's hard to beat at 30 bucks :grin:

cheers, Tom
doodyrh
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Neither here nor there.

Post by doodyrh »

Wotcha reckon?
Willy twerk?

Archos thing
It's got digital in (?) and headphone socket.

Okay it's not cheap but it does a million other useful things.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: doodyrh on 2003-10-11 19:59 ]</font>
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23380
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

if you get the little mixer,you might consider a product brand called phonic.phonic is the world's largest oem manufacturer.in fact they make products for alesis roland and yamaha.what's important to this discussion is that they make the behringer products and since behringer makes a mackie clone product,phonic does too,but for cheaper.the phonic version of the behringer mixer is the exact same mixer with the phonic name on it.it is more or less to the same specs as the mackie.their products(phonic) are EXCELLENT.

http://www.phonic.com/mm-mm1002a.htm
http://www.phonic.com/mm-mm1202.htm

this rta is the hottest thing on the market: http://www.phonic.com/mei-paa2.htm
doodyrh
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Neither here nor there.

Post by doodyrh »

Just thought I'd conclude this thread with my final choice.
OK I cheated. It wasn't really cheap.
Focusrite TwinTrak Pro.

An excellent combined front and back end to a DAW.
Just a simple Scoop EQ (no relation to Scooby Doo) and compressor on the front with a send/return and a digital in feed from PC for monitoring. I route the out to Pulsar and fork one thru guitar effects back to the TTPro return for monitoring and one to ASIO for recording.

Perfect Pulsar Playmate.

:smile:
Post Reply