does enyone us the pink big mixer ?
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
- Ben Walker
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 4:00 pm
- Contact:
The pink mixer is sort of my fault! Being colour blind I used to find it impossible to tell the difference between the solo'ed and unsolo'ed state of tracks in the Big mixer as there wasn't enough contrast, and I used to moan about this. Ingo uploaded the Pink mixer, which is just the old Big mixer with Pink buttons!
Ben
Ben
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Contact:
Too bad Creamware didn't debug the BigMixer.....
I really like it's flexible EQ, just keep adding bands till it sounds good... I never understood why Creamware called this module the '4 band EQ' as in fact you can keep adding bands until you run out of dsp
Then there's the EQ on the master section... MIDI-automation on all EQ paramters...... (I use them as very flexible MIDI-controllable filters)..... the large amount of controls crammed on each channel strip for efficient screen usage.... bars instead of knobs for all parameters allows very easy adjustment and readout... and I can go on....
That's why I still use the thing
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ernest@303.nu on 2002-11-18 06:31 ]</font>
I really like it's flexible EQ, just keep adding bands till it sounds good... I never understood why Creamware called this module the '4 band EQ' as in fact you can keep adding bands until you run out of dsp

Then there's the EQ on the master section... MIDI-automation on all EQ paramters...... (I use them as very flexible MIDI-controllable filters)..... the large amount of controls crammed on each channel strip for efficient screen usage.... bars instead of knobs for all parameters allows very easy adjustment and readout... and I can go on....
That's why I still use the thing

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ernest@303.nu on 2002-11-18 06:31 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Contact:
- John Cooper
- Moderator
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Planet Z
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
- Contact:
Sorry for that but the layout reminds me my 6 year old son toys like MyFirstRecorder or so...On 2002-11-19 18:11, ernest@303.nu wrote:
BTW Am I the only one who likes the layout of the Bug Mixer better than the newer mixers?
-
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Contact:
I don't mind, still using My First Sony recorder sometimes for it's specific low-fi qualities 
But seriously, the bugmixer may look a bit childish, but I wasn't exactly raving about the aestetics... I like to see all parameters of all channels at once (instead of using the mouse to get an overview), I like the informative nature of sliders, the compact layout.... it's a pity of all the bugs.

But seriously, the bugmixer may look a bit childish, but I wasn't exactly raving about the aestetics... I like to see all parameters of all channels at once (instead of using the mouse to get an overview), I like the informative nature of sliders, the compact layout.... it's a pity of all the bugs.