A question about STS

Talk about the STS series of Creamware samplers.

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
valis
Posts: 7731
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: A question about STS

Post by valis »

Yes, I am suggesting a legacy PCI system for STS samplers.
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: A question about STS

Post by Bud Weiser »

drhardlove wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 6:30 am ... the Xite-1.
I don't know how many dsp's it has actually. 🙈
:D

12 333MHz and 6 60MHz SHARC.

But I agree w/ Valis,-

SCOPE 32Bit (4.5 and 5.1 are the by me recommended versions) is best for STS, Vdat and everything Modular and ZARG using samples for their presets or are able to load samples.
Rules also for some time-based FX like tape delay in modular and other stuff using host computer´s RAM.

:)

Bud
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7731
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: A question about STS

Post by valis »

It may be that (if we are able to help Scope 8 emerge) that the sample OSCs and some other current memory address related device bugs are actually fixed, but it's unclear if STS ever will be as it's not a huge need in the market. Remember that there ARE still actual hardware samplers on the market (MPC's, Elektron, legacy samplers on the secondhand market, etc) so users like drhardlove that want it for niche uses are a niche of a niche within the market. Hard to justify in terms of dev expense unless there's some way to specifically market the result that will achieve a return on investment there. And we can all see what has happened to that end of the market in terms of disappearing to native and 'prosumer' offerings that 'work well enough' to scavenge the higher end--leaving it entirely to musicians who want a hardware only workflow as more due to User Experience / workflow reasons. Ie, people who want to move away from computers and laptops entirely! So it would be hard to sell those users on again using a computer for low latency hardware like experiences, imho.

But, you never know. If there's considerable interest in investing in Scope 8 maybe enough funds would appear to help STS too. That's a reference to something that's not visible to the public yet, so more on that later.
drhardlove
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: A question about STS

Post by drhardlove »

Bud Weiser wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 4:25 am
drhardlove wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 6:30 am ... the Xite-1.
I don't know how many dsp's it has actually. 🙈
:D

12 333MHz and 6 60MHz SHARC.

But I agree w/ Valis,-

SCOPE 32Bit (4.5 and 5.1 are the by me recommended versions) is best for STS, Vdat and everything Modular and ZARG using samples for their presets or are able to load samples.
Rules also for some time-based FX like tape delay in modular and other stuff using host computer´s RAM.

:)
Bud
Thanks Bud.
So are there challenges using v7 in 32 bit then?
I have bought it, because I thought I had to.
I guess it can still come in handy, on another 64 bit system, since I also like to bring the Xite-1 when travelling with laptop.

I tried to find what ZARG is, but was unsuccessful.
Can you enlighten me further on that?

Regards
Kay
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8460
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: A question about STS

Post by astroman »

I have an MPC4000 (an Akai Z4 sampler in disguise plus a groove sequencer) and consider it on an equal level of sophistication as Scope.
But I wouldn‘t hesitate 1 minute to replace it by Spectrasonics Stylus, if it was only about the groove. ;)
For any non-perfect finger drummer Stylus does the same job in less than 1/10th of the time.
Imho Stylus is an outstanding product and comes bundled with their full „classic“ Akai groove CD portfolio.

I also second a 32bit system for STS and VDAT ...
myself running Scope7 on Win7/32bit on Asus P4C800, Intel 875 chipset, mobile P4 (with the 1 bent leg mod to reduce Vcore) 2Ghz, 2GB Ram, the most stable Scope system I ever experienced.

Zarg is the company of John Bowen, famous for the Solaris Synth, which started as a Scope device.
drhardlove
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: A question about STS

Post by drhardlove »

astroman wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:53 pm I have an MPC4000 (an Akai Z4 sampler in disguise plus a groove sequencer) and consider it on an equal level of sophistication as Scope.
But I wouldn‘t hesitate 1 minute to replace it by Spectrasonics Stylus, if it was only about the groove. ;)
For any non-perfect finger drummer Stylus does the same job in less than 1/10th of the time.
Imho Stylus is an outstanding product and comes bundled with their full „classic“ Akai groove CD portfolio.

I also second a 32bit system for STS and VDAT ...
myself running Scope7 on Win7/32bit on Asus P4C800, Intel 875 chipset, mobile P4 (with the 1 bent leg mod to reduce Vcore) 2Ghz, 2GB Ram, the most stable Scope system I ever experienced.

Zarg is the company of John Bowen, famous for the Solaris Synth, which started as a Scope device.
Thx. I have the Stylus RMX, and I don't mind using that, or any drum machine, or sample player, in the Daw domain. But my main focus with the Scope Xite-1, is to achieve latency free control of natural sounding instruments like bass, woodwinds, horns, and anything like that, with my midi guitar.

I also have trillian and other great vst instruments, but the latency annoys me big time. I like to play my ideas trough a real time signal. I guess a hardware sampler or workstation can replace the lack of a sample player in Scope. I suspect the latency via Xite-1 to the sampler will be minimal.

I struggle with very high latency in my motu pro based main system.

Thanks for the clarification on Zarg. I am familiar with the name John Bowen and Solaris.
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: A question about STS

Post by Bud Weiser »

drhardlove wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:25 pm
So are there challenges using v7 in 32 bit then?
I have bought it, because I thought I had to.
I guess it can still come in handy, on another 64 bit system, since I also like to bring the Xite-1 when travelling with laptop.
Typing from my head,- I don´t remember the details,- but some devices make trouble also in Scope v7 32Bit and they work better in Scope v5.1.

It´s no biggie.
When you got Scope v7,- that´s v5 keys for the devices,- except for the application, which always will need a individual key.
So the question is,- do you have v5.1 and a key ?
drhardlove wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:25 pm I tried to find what ZARG is, but was unsuccessful.
Can you enlighten me further on that?
https://johnbowen.com/new/zarg-music/

Only 4 devices mentioned and all the older ones ignored.
Old website is gone.

:)

Bud
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23401
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: A question about STS

Post by garyb »

you don't need a v5.1 key with v7 32bit. just the zip with the v5.1 files from support.
User avatar
sunmachine
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:37 am

Re: A question about STS

Post by sunmachine »

Bud Weiser wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 8:32 am
https://johnbowen.com/new/zarg-music/

Only 4 devices mentioned and all the older ones ignored.
Old website is gone.
All devices are listed in the "Legacy->Products->Product List" menu.

The old web site is archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20220519060 ... music.net/
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2918
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: A question about STS

Post by Bud Weiser »

thx, bookmarked !
Post Reply