Updated Small Mixer Family (Versions 2)

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
mausmuso
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:00 pm

Updated Small Mixer Family (Versions 2)

Post by mausmuso »

Hi There,
Here are a number of updated mixers having had their Faders, VU's and Text Fields reworked to be more reflective of input levels.
There are 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 channel mixers in the set.
Thanks to Bud for pointing out the anomalies with the first versions of these devices.

Also there is a bigger 16 Channel mixer, NuMix164+, which has a couple of new features:
  • Solo & Exclusive switching for the 4 outputs (Added so it possible to quickly switch between outs for comparison on different speaker/headphones systems),
  • 5 Skins for each channel,
  • Scratch pad for labelling the Mixer.
Hope you find them useful.

I have also created a family of switching devices for soloing and exclusive outputting based on the functionality added to the NuMix164+.
This provides switching functionality outside the NuMix164+.
I can upload them if anyone might like them?
regards
maus
NuMix164 Exclusive Outs.png
NuMix164 Exclusive Outs.png (168.88 KiB) Viewed 287 times
Stereo Switching.png
Stereo Switching.png (130.58 KiB) Viewed 287 times
SmlMix2v2.zip
(4.16 MiB) Downloaded 5 times
Last edited by mausmuso on Sat Sep 20, 2025 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2904
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by Bud Weiser »

Thank you, Maus. I´ve found and downloaded.
No time for testing today, but over the weekend.

Is "phase lock" testing possible without using SDK ?
If yes,- how ?
mausmuso
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by mausmuso »

Hey Bud,
I am not sure about phase locking.
You have peaked my interest though and I might look into phasing to see what can be done.
I personally have never had an issue.
A lot of my mixing and mastering is now done in Cubase/Wavelab so I can use Izotope, Sonible and NuGen tools.
I do bring tracks out to Scope to use scope Fxs/Synths/etc.
These tracks are then fed back to audio track s in Cubase and tweaked to eliminate recording delays.
I do use Pi in Cubase to phase align tracks like kicks and bass, and I check mixes in mono to make sure nothing disappears due to phasing, but currently that's about it.
Good luck with the new mixers.
regards
maus
User avatar
yayajohn
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:01 pm
Location: Everywhere....Nowhere

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by yayajohn »

Awesome! Thanks maus.
guppy
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by guppy »

Thank you mausmuso !
Rafe
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:55 pm

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by Rafe »

Thanks for the excellent devices
mausmuso
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by mausmuso »

Bud Weiser wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:21 am Is "phase lock" testing possible without using SDK ?
If yes,- how ?
Bud, I am sure it is possible to check phase in both scope and scope sdk.
I am no expert on phase measurement, but I think you can do it using similar setup to that shown below.
I just fed the same signal to all inputs and then look at the output for any distortion.
The Oscilloscope (available in Scope) and the same output signal fed to a Cubase track with plugin 'MOscilloscope' (free plugin from MelbaProduction) appears to me to have no visible phasing issues as a result of summing all the inputs associated with the Small Mix 16.
Happy to be corrected if my assumptions are incorrect.
regards
maus
Attachments
ScopePhasing.png
ScopePhasing.png (194.69 KiB) Viewed 11202 times
MOscilloscope.png
MOscilloscope.png (50.93 KiB) Viewed 11202 times
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7703
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: Small Mixer Family

Post by valis »

Easier than that, you want a 1 cycle click or ramp that starts at 100 and goes to 0, then resets in 1 sample, etc. Record the output to see the offsets, and toggle channels to see where they misalign. it only matters where you will have parallel processing (like parallel compression, etc) or where you mix multiple mics open to the same source, and of course stereo pairs are the most critical. Send effects (100% wet return) and mixing discrete sources is much less of a concern, though when layering drums you need to again be careful (easiest in the DAW in this era).

Also, Scope projects can load differently if devices aren't locked to specific dsps. This is where the phase discontinuities tend to come from to begin with, and they can load differently on subsequent loads, though it's mostly predictable if you don't make major changes once a project has been loaded a *second time*. This is because the project tends to load in the same order on reload (once built). As a dev, locking things that should fit on a single dsp into a single block to ensure they are phase accurate was the main task. Note it's been over a decade since I was in SDK and I'm not the SDK master here, so forgive my poor choice of term(s) if that happens to be the case.
mausmuso
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:00 pm

Re: Updated Small Mixer Family (Versions 2)

Post by mausmuso »

Small Mixers have been updated.
See amended first post
maus
guppy
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: Updated Small Mixer Family (Versions 2)

Post by guppy »

Nice job, thank you Maus !
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2904
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: Updated Small Mixer Family (Versions 2)

Post by Bud Weiser »

Hello Maus !

Thx for the updates,- I´ll check ´em out as soon as I can.
And yes,- I´d be very interested in trying the switchers too !!!

best

:)

Bud
Post Reply