Hey guys,
I seem them everywhere....
What's the big deal with the new fruity loops. Tell me more.
WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL WITH POSTS ON FRUITYLOOPS
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
-
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
- Contact:
Subject headings in capitol letters come from a common usage of the English language. When writing memos, correspondence, as in this forum, its complimentary to use all caps in the subject heading. See this link:
http://www.essortment.com/in/Hobbies.Wr ... %20letters
Hope that clearifies this. In the US Navy, we use a Naval Correspondence Manual. I can't find a link on the web since we use our own closed part of the web for stuff like that. It's standard practice in miltiary correspondence too.
I hope that helps.
http://www.essortment.com/in/Hobbies.Wr ... %20letters
Hope that clearifies this. In the US Navy, we use a Naval Correspondence Manual. I can't find a link on the web since we use our own closed part of the web for stuff like that. It's standard practice in miltiary correspondence too.
I hope that helps.
I'm so fond of Fruity cos of:
-Easy step sequencer, easy song schematics, easy edits.
-Every channel (weither it's VST/VSTi/sampler/proprietary format/WASP/Simsynth/TS404/...) has easy sound edit,
-Very easy Midi remote, (right click, auto accept etc) plus editing of each parameter is easy, throughout the whole song,
-Cool built-in delay into sampler channels: each parameter (FB, cutoff, reso, pitch, pan) continues on last delay sound, so no 'after delay effect filter' but rather fluent modulations
-It's the professionnal Rebirth, confirmed after 3.5 being released so it can be mixed on VST mixer
Now w multi-out, lots more new possibilities will arise, like putting decent realtime Fx after each bus/channel
-Downmixes 16bit via 256bit calculations and high interpolation if you want, at any samplerate (preferable 44.1) so once you downmix, it can take a while but it will sound best.
-Supports Dx/VST/VSTi fx and synths.
-...
Con's: hard to fine tune delay time
Visit http://www.fruityloops.com and get the demo, if you're interested! Fruityloops does not eat your registry, it's the most simple install you'll ever get
And the Full version costs only *99$* Rebirth, it's direct competitor, is about double the price and offers a tenth of Fruity's options...
A big fan I am,
at0mic.
ps. In aviation they ask us to write everything in capital letters. Cos some people's handwriting is just not readable when the write normally
And we want to avoid confusion as you may understand details can be very important.
-Easy step sequencer, easy song schematics, easy edits.
-Every channel (weither it's VST/VSTi/sampler/proprietary format/WASP/Simsynth/TS404/...) has easy sound edit,
-Very easy Midi remote, (right click, auto accept etc) plus editing of each parameter is easy, throughout the whole song,
-Cool built-in delay into sampler channels: each parameter (FB, cutoff, reso, pitch, pan) continues on last delay sound, so no 'after delay effect filter' but rather fluent modulations
-It's the professionnal Rebirth, confirmed after 3.5 being released so it can be mixed on VST mixer

-Downmixes 16bit via 256bit calculations and high interpolation if you want, at any samplerate (preferable 44.1) so once you downmix, it can take a while but it will sound best.
-Supports Dx/VST/VSTi fx and synths.
-...
Con's: hard to fine tune delay time
Visit http://www.fruityloops.com and get the demo, if you're interested! Fruityloops does not eat your registry, it's the most simple install you'll ever get

A big fan I am,
at0mic.
ps. In aviation they ask us to write everything in capital letters. Cos some people's handwriting is just not readable when the write normally

Atomic, I've just bought Fruity full, but is there any way to record in real time while the pattern loops ? My pattern seems to get lost somewhere and I can't seem to reposition it on top of my drum pattern. Is there a simple trick to solving this ?
* And in PUBLISHING the accepted theory is that UPPER CASE IS MUCH HARDER TO READ THAN LOWER CASE AND THEREFORE YOU SHOULDN'T WRITE TOO MUCH OR PEOPLE WILL BECOME FATIGUED AND JUST STOP READING
* Another part of the theory is that when reading, part of the "instant recognition" process is to see the pattern of ascending stokes and descending strokes (ie: the ascending stroke in 'd' and the decsending in 'g' ) and to recall the word in part from this without having to actually read the entire thing.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2002-05-22 16:33 ]</font>
* And in PUBLISHING the accepted theory is that UPPER CASE IS MUCH HARDER TO READ THAN LOWER CASE AND THEREFORE YOU SHOULDN'T WRITE TOO MUCH OR PEOPLE WILL BECOME FATIGUED AND JUST STOP READING
* Another part of the theory is that when reading, part of the "instant recognition" process is to see the pattern of ascending stokes and descending strokes (ie: the ascending stroke in 'd' and the decsending in 'g' ) and to recall the word in part from this without having to actually read the entire thing.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2002-05-22 16:33 ]</font>