I assume you mean the Avid Venue board :niceboy wrote:Avid TDM HD was maybe someting else. I ment to connect to a Venue board or one other board with MADI
http://www.avid.com/US/products/VENUE-MADI-Option-Card
I assume you mean the Avid Venue board :niceboy wrote:Avid TDM HD was maybe someting else. I ment to connect to a Venue board or one other board with MADI
Yes thats what I ment ,and saw also on theire site , the Option-CardWarp69 wrote:I assume you mean the Avid Venue board :niceboy wrote:Avid TDM HD was maybe someting else. I ment to connect to a Venue board or one other board with MADI
http://www.avid.com/US/products/VENUE-MADI-Option-Card
They have the EXACT same connections - the picture on the Thomann site have protective plugs - you'll have to remove those before use.niceboy wrote:http://www.thomann.de/se/ssl_pci_expres ... faces.html
AhaWarp69 wrote:They have the EXACT same connections - the picture on the Thomann site have protective plugs - you'll have to remove those before use.niceboy wrote:http://www.thomann.de/se/ssl_pci_expres ... faces.html
Eh?niceboy wrote:expect us to have a card like that ,even though we dont have a Venue board .
I am not worried but you missed my last editing of the question because you where so quick.Warp69 wrote:There's only one standard for MADI - SSL and Avid use the same.
The picture on thomann (MADIXtreme 128) shows two protective plugs, but underneath there're actual 4 connections (2 under each plug) - Each protective plug hides 1 port for 'Out' and 1 port for 'In' - the exact same ports exist on the MADI opt card for Venue. Absolutely no difference.
The MADI cables comes in pair (multimode optics - the same cables for 10Gb+ networks) - the head of the cable contains both the In and Out port - you can only fit the cable one way, so don't worry.
Warp69 wrote:Eh?niceboy wrote:expect us to have a card like that ,even though we dont have a Venue board .
That's a rather expensive solution - it's a $3500 opt card?!
Sorry for confusion.astroman wrote:for 16 channels in plus 16 channels out it needs 1 A16 device
...or 2 with s/mux if higher sample rates than 48k are required.
(just to clarify - port number count can be confusing today...)
cheers, Tom
??? What http://www.solid-state-logic.com/post/X ... /index.aspgaryb wrote:nice speaking with you on the phone...
afaik, those MADI cards should all be full duplex(work both in and out at the same time).
as we discussed, you can use higher than 48k with the ADAT connections if you use S-MUX(not all ADAT hardware will do S-MUX). the limitation is that you lose half of your ADAT i/o when using S-MUX. if you use samplerates higher than 48khz with MADI and don't use S-MUX, you won't be able to use the ADAT i/o. if you use 44.1k or 48k, your MADI and ADAT i/o can all be synced to the same clock without S-MUX.
i don't know, but it appears that the SSL cards do not work in win7 64bit.
No need to waste the juice all the time.astroman wrote:well, there are (exist) devices that handle multiple samplerates simultaneously (realtime samplerate conversion)
no idea if the system you connect to has something like that - at least it's not exotic, in fact it's standard in onboard audio codecs and streaming content (not that great implementation usually, tho...).
Anyway, an A16 MK2 doesn't cost an arm and a leg and you could solve it easily with a 2nd unit if someone insists on 96k and if it keeps things more simple.
But frankly speaking that's a nerd attitude...
There IS a difference between 44.1 and 96k that's easily detected in a listening room or a studio - but under live conditions ? C'mon... that must be a f*cking great treated venue ...
Hey, this is DSP processing - they oversample internally where required (Minimax filter for example)...
No need to waste the juice all the time.
cheers, Tom
Yes but we are going to convert with the ADAT to MADI converters or converter, and you say that its no problem that we use 48 KHZ,garyb wrote:if the Avid Venue is connected via MADI, it doesn't matter if it does S-MUX. S-MUX is for 96k using ADAT.
We have worked for 20 years doing as much feedback as we could, building our own Soundmixer also, but one year ago we started to use SCOPE 5,0,garyb wrote:S-MUX is a way of getting 8 channels of 96k out of 2 ADAT lightpipe connectors.
if you are connecting to a system that is 96k via MADI-in other words, going out of the Venue's MADI port into an A16 Mk2's MADI port then out of the A16 Mk2's ADAT ports as S-MUX into Scope's, or any other device's ADAT ports as S-MUX, that will work.
if you connect to a 48k system, you won't need S-MUX and you'll have 16 ADAT channels instead of 8.
if you want to burn resources to reproduce high frequencies that a PA system is incapable of reproducing, then do so, by all means. 96k or 48k, there's no difference on a PA system, and all cds are 44.1k. i remember when stores only had records and we were told how much better cds sound, how much better the specs were and that we had to buy them. today, analog vinyl is still the standard in audiophile recordings, but 44.1k cds can sound fantastic too. 44.1k cds and vinyl can also sound pretty crappy.
But we are doing feedback and with one of the signals we use inverse phase to get as much as possible ,garyb wrote:no S-MUX isn't expensive, it's just another way of using the ADAT ports.
i'm sure there is a way to resample from 96k to 48k in realtime, but it seems unecessary. i would say that things will likely sound a little better when recording at 96k, but by the time you downsample to 44.1k for cd or worse, go to mp3, any advantage from the higher samplerate will be lost. you will always lose quality(though almost inaudibly if using a good algorythm) when downsampling.