psy q

Tips and advice for getting the most from Scope. No questions here please.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

buy psy q.
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Nice tip, Sandro, but a little motivation would be helpfull and make it more convincing :wink: Ie. I don't know what this Psy Q thing is...
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

kimgr
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Easter Bronx, DK
Contact:

Post by kimgr »

I agree Sandrob.
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

PsyQ and OptiMaster are excellent tools, I agree, with PsyQ, remember to be <i>light</i> on the effect, or it will make your song too "glassy." But I'll probably use this all the time now.

OptiMaster is also an excellent tool, with quite a few options. It doesn't impart too much character, which is nice in a mastering plugin, and gives you a nice multiband compressor, expander, limiter... the Wizard function is surprisingly good, using this, you will only need to make some minor adjustments to fit your particular taste/application. (Although I imagine I'll get to the point where I would be able to set this all quickly myself... can't wait until I'm that good) :smile: ...
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i try optimaster but in one hour of demo's duration i didn't find how good is and now i don't want to risk - to buy thing what i'm not sure that can work better than tools what i usualy use for same thing.
but psy q is another story. i'm sure that's working and sounds better than some similar native (or other) tools what i had chance to tried.

1 hour demo is not enough - cw make big mistake here!
_________________
<font size=-1>"got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you"</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2002-05-02 10:05 ]</font>
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23374
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

optimaster is good.
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

I also have the Timeworks DSP suite. I still think I will use the OptiMaster, ever so lightly, even with the Timeworks Mastering Compressors...

I could tell within 20 minutes of messing around with OptiMaster (on a full MP3 file playing from WinAMP) that it was a really great and usable tool, but you are right, it has a LOT of options, and an hour could be too short to really run through it.

PSY Q is pretty awesome. I don't see a point having a BBE sonic maximizer in the studio with this around, I prefer the PsyQ sound...
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

On 2002-05-02 10:25, subhuman wrote:
I could tell within 20 minutes of messing around with OptiMaster (on a full MP3 file playing from WinAMP) that it was a really great and usable tool, but you are right, it has a LOT of options, and an hour could be too short to really run through it.
yes, i found that's optimaster is "good" tool but i tried to do mastering with optimaster in one hour, and when times goes, i do mastering like i usualy do. then i found then i had better result on "custom" way but i have no another chance to try it again, but realy try - not in one hour. now i'm afraid to buy optimaster (it's not cheap). i don't have big experience and knowlage - i need little more time... and many of us! :smile:
PSY Q is pretty awesome. I don't see a point having a BBE sonic maximizer in the studio with this around, I prefer the PsyQ sound...
usualy i use bbe and i prefere natives, but in last time cw & co suprised me more and more in positive way.
pt-free 96k, now psy q... tomorrow optimaster - maybe...
i sale my second pulsar board, but i'm afraid that i'll buy it again, because pulsar becomes to me something like "needle and spoon"! :wink:

_________________
<font size=-1>"got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you"</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2002-05-02 11:17 ]</font>
User avatar
dbmac
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by dbmac »

Yeah, the PsyQ is pretty amazing, I'm using it in just about every project. I just wish I understood better what it was doing. It's unlike any other EQ I've ever used, and I understand it's not really an EQ device, but the absence of numerical parameters (freq, q, dB or threshold settings) make it kind of a voodoo device - crank up the "process", twiddle the "shape", check the "sound" button. It's pretty easy to get the hang of it, but knowing a little more about the actual sound processing that's being done would be, well, enlightening anyway.
Do you figure there's some harmonic synthesis (like the BBE) happening?
/dave
ernest@303.nu
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by ernest@303.nu »

my opinion: here!

I would like to add that the 'Opti' is pretty easy to 'master' after some while :smile:
Just tweak the wizard's results and the presets (which are subtle but I like them). (Un)muting the frequency bands make it easier to understand what's happening.
And the expanders are cool too:)

The PsyQ really still shines after months of use.

Both highly recommended.
Post Reply