Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by dawman »

article-1193793-056764B3000005DC-721_634x469.jpg
netguyjoel
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:34 am
Location: The Land of Cheese, Beer & Fat Chicks

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by netguyjoel »

Acccchhhhhlllllaaaaa flem ccchhhhlllllaaa flem muchchchchaaaaallllaaaa,

yeah...I hate traditional Judeo-Christian values too...that's exactly what's wrong with this country......

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: nice one JV
Joel
User avatar
iSiStOy
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:00 pm

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by iSiStOy »

:lol: :lol:
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by algorhythm »

Valis, you're owning this thread. kudos on most everything you've said.
siriusbliss wrote:
braincell wrote:rationing food, or means of supply of food will only make people sicker
Actually, rationing food for obese americans might make them healthier. :)
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23255
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by garyb »

well, fat and obese are two different things. some people are VERY healthy fat. i can't put fat on. obese is mainly the result of processed food and no exercise, so the lifestyle that has been promoted by those who now speak for rationing(and there's very official talk) seems unfair. once again, the farmer breaks the plow horse's legs and then beats the animal because it can't plow the field.

welcome back algorythm! :lol:
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by valis »

algorhythm wrote:Valis, you're owning this thread. kudos on most everything you've said.
Don't make me reread this thread just to make sure I'm not utterly embarrassed by something :P
garyb wrote:..obese is mainly the result of processed food and no exercise...
Agreed. And 'rationing for your health' sounds suspiciously like something our papers reported for the USSR some years back, only with a nicer helpful 'nanny state' overtone added too boot.

& ditto on the Welcome Back algorhythm!
King of Snake
Posts: 1544
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by King of Snake »

This sounds close to the system we have here in Holland although yours sounds a lot more expensive.
Over here, there's a mandatory base insurance as well that will cost you between 80 and 100 Euro's a month, depending on which insurance company you are with.
You have the option to switch to a different insurance once a year if you like their price or service better.
For stuff like the dentist, you have to buy an extra insurance as well. I'm not sure of the costs for this but let's say that's another 20 euro a month. For the base insurance, you have a 150 euro "own risk" (ie you pay the first 150 euro yourself before the insurance kicks in) but this is only for the base isurance and not for any extra insurances, like dentist, you might have.

Personally I don't have a problem with this system, although it gotten more expensive since they privatised the whole system a couple of years ago (before that you could have a base insurance with a cheaper, government-run healthcare fund). It seems to me it's definitely preferable to having millions of people with no insurance at all.

iSiStOy wrote:Sorry about being that late on that topic but allow me to tell you about my experience of health insurance here, in Switzerland (I could compare with France and Luxembourg as well) :

Costs between 200 & 300 chf (nearly equal to $ currently) / month and IS mandatory (called LAMal).
No reimbursement before having been invoiced 300 chf / year.
No cover for dental, nor glasses. You need complementary insurance.
Politicians claim it is a good thing because health care accounts are balanced (I guess they are more than balanced).
LAMal is private insurance companies (hundreds of them, it's a market!) and they constantly increases contributions (sometimes by 10% steps), meaning concurrence is not even part of that game.

Many citizens have critics about that system as it is definitively unequal (instead of at least paying in relation to what you earn) and is definitively made for some economical/lobbying purpose so that, each time a federal referendum is called for this system to change (yes, we can here. I mean not me because I am not Swiss), it fails.

Knowing that, I personally think it is a big mistake as it will not do some good to people in the mid-long term.
User avatar
iSiStOy
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:00 pm

Re: Happy Birthday U.S.A.

Post by iSiStOy »

King of Snake wrote:You have the option to switch to a different insurance once a year if you like their price or service better.
Same here. Don't miss that anniversary date if you've been tricked by microscopic contract terms.
Personally I don't have a problem with this system, although it gotten more expensive since they privatised the whole system a couple of years ago
Quite feeling the same and I assume private system doesn't help upgrading its quality, as the main goal is certainly not to serve people.
Post Reply