pulsar and TC powercore

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
kiminet
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by kiminet »

Can pulsar and TC powercore work together on the same machine?

Kim
kimgr
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Easter Bronx, DK
Contact:

Post by kimgr »

Yes.
kiminet
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by kiminet »

Tak for svaret.
Kim Kristensen
kimgr
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Easter Bronx, DK
Contact:

Post by kimgr »

Velkommen :smile:

But why add a Powercore ? It sucks. (In my not so humble opinion).
It's plugins doesn't sound very good, and it introduces extra latency...
A better idea would be to get the Sonictimeworks plugins and get some extra Creamware DSP's.
If you really want a VST card, go for the UAD-1: It's cheaper and sounds a hell lot better.

Kim.
kiminet
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by kiminet »

But tha Timeworks plugins for Pulsar are not updated for 3.0.I,ve got his RevervX which is the best DX reverb around and according to the developer better that the the 4080L for Pulsar.
Kim
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

Timeworks has mentioned that they will be releasing a V3 compatible installer & fixing the issues with their plugins on the CW platform. I can't wait!

But you can use the STW software w/ V3 right now even under XP... you just have to manually copy over the files to the appropriate directories.
dxl
Posts: 329
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by dxl »

TC and UAD-1 all sound better than creamware's

TC have more plugs
UAD-1 have the best compressors.

UAD-1 and TC will have the same latency problem but if you system is powerfull enought to set ASIO latency at 13ms or lower, then it's not a big deal

go for creamware might cause none sufficent PCI bandwith, and not very pro quality, 3rd parties are pro sounding but bad DSP optimization(mostly)
I'm still seeing new things in life.
<p><a href="http://mp3.com/dxl">www.mp3.com/dxl</a></p>
Sunshine
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Stuttgart

Post by Sunshine »

You may be right for the compressors.....
But keep in mind, even when an engineer would have all the tools in the world, he would not choose 1176, LA-2A on everything. What I want to say by that is that you might carry your mixes too far to the 80´s.... It always depends on the application and situation. Also those kind of "sterile" sounding TC-things can be exactly the right tools when no additional analog distortion should be added and no coloration should take place. Having UAD-1 on everything whould mean to have something like an UAD console, which does not exist and wouldn´t be the first choice for anyone. There always has to be the right balance. Some people love the sound of an SSL, but personally I think the sound of a SSL is too far away from neutral. I compared the timeworks stuff to many other things in this world, and I felt they have just the right amount of coloration to not have to colorate your material once again. "Transparency" is getting more and more important in nowadays productions! A piece of gear that's more transparent has less audible effect on the signal. Less artifact (distortion & etc) It doesn't hype the signal...doesn't add warmth, air, gizz...anything. That´s the reason why manufacturers like TC do have encreasing sales. On the Sony Oxford console you´ll find the most transparent and versatile compressors and EQ´s. But they do not sound "hot" or "warm". But it also depends on whether you use something for tracking, mixing or mastering. For tracking I also love warm sounding gear, but for mixing I´d rather prefer something more neutral and balaced. So IMO everything has its justification somehow....


Regards,
Sunshine
Post Reply