First of all hello to all you of the forum and then a question (perhaps) stupid: works SFP with Windows Server 2003?
Thanks in advance for yor answers.
SFP and Windows Server 2003
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
That's an interesting question.
But I think it's probably not as recommended idea as it might appear to be.
A *lot* of what Windows Server OS has to do with is ACTIVE DIRECTORY. Since it is a live database with thousands of settings, it can really hit your system hard when it is doing its thing.
I think XP versions are really what we need to deal with for Scope. (PS, I've been testing Vista in a lot of ways for quite a while now, and it can be a real dog at times.)
But I think it's probably not as recommended idea as it might appear to be.
A *lot* of what Windows Server OS has to do with is ACTIVE DIRECTORY. Since it is a live database with thousands of settings, it can really hit your system hard when it is doing its thing.
I think XP versions are really what we need to deal with for Scope. (PS, I've been testing Vista in a lot of ways for quite a while now, and it can be a real dog at times.)
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:11 am
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:11 am
Yes, I did it. Unfortunately, the best that XP can see are 3,240 GB.ScofieldKid wrote:Did you give the /PAE boot extension a try for Windows XP?
I know there is also some 3GB switch that might also help some applications get more memory, but not sure how these two interact.
So I thought to Windows Server 2003 that should not have problems to give me 4G with the PAE function. But I do not know whether Cubase SX3 or Cubase 4 work seamlessly with that OS.