Is Planet Z becoming HUGE ?

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

Anyone notice how fast Planet Z has been growing this past six months ? In about a month the number of registered users will probably hit 1000 (lucky door prize?). Last night I noticed that instead of the usual 5 to 10 people browsing there were 23 :eek:

A healthy, happy forum means a healthy, happy platform perhaps ?
borg
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: antwerp, belgium

Post by borg »

a few weeks ago, i was wondering how many people actually have a pulsar, luna or scope in their machine. does anyone have any numbers? how many people make music, and how many of these do their stuff on a computer? of these computer based musicians/technicians, how many take it more seriously and spend more than $1000 on a sound card? so, i'm really surprised planetZ has nearly a thousand participants.
andy
the lunatics are in the hall
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

http://www.creamware.de/en/contact/hist ... p=EN/PRESS

<i>Pulsar became a great success. Within just a few months after its initial release, more than 10,000 units were installed world-wide. </i>

And that page hasn't been changed in a bit, so I am sure that number is much higher.
King of Snake
Posts: 1544
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:

Post by King of Snake »

And I'm sure that with the direction CW is taking, with the new software and the NOAH they will get a lot more interest from developers and new users. This is really some pretty cool and well thought-out stuff they're doing.
dxl
Posts: 329
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by dxl »

hope so
caleb
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by caleb »

But is this platform actually getting bigger or is it going stale?

I've also noticed that the synths produced for this platform don't seem to shine with uniqueness compared to synths being created for native solutions.

I'm not saying this to create a fight, I'm more looking for opinions as to how Pulsar is faring as a development platform.

There are some pretty impressive synths that I've seen so far like Lightwave and Prisma seems pretty good and Vectron would have to be pretty amazing.

From the freeware I'm really impressed with a couple out there and I've heard that Zarg's synths are pretty amazing, but is it a platform that is on the incline or on the decline?

I'm just curious to hear the opinions of people who have been using this platform for quite some time as I'm relatively new here.
Caleb

Happiness is the hidden behind the obvious.
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

I wonder also... as many of the parts to build a synth are pre built by creamware.. So it seems to me that whatever you want to do, creamware has to do it for you first. But, I don't use the DP package so I wouldn't know the details.

If only creamware would let go of part of the technology, maybe we'd have more freedom and possibilities of development. While that would bring some technical issues, I'd still think it's better for the platform. I'd say, might as well use C as the common development language because then, all you need is a text editor, and some good example code (which there are TONS of). Creamware always trying to be a step ahead just isn't going to work.

But anyway, PlanetZ IS getting huge. Posts get burried away quicker than ever!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2002-03-13 05:03 ]</font>
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

Much as I love this platform it does seem to be true that we're not getting the really leading edge stuff you can find elsewhere. The new synths are still just the ADSR standard signal path VA / FM design. My personal gripe is having no direct audio export from Pulsar - now a standard feature elsewhere. Other discussions have talked about the lack of granular abilities, the "closed shop" of the ModV2 and poor MIDI specs.

Against that CW seems to be doing a lot of development work lately and 3.1 is imminent...

And who can argue with the sweet, sweet sound ?

ps: 27 users online last night :eek:

A new Reason 2 synth. This is an interesting concept - nothing like it on Pulsar. Have a listen to the demos.
http://www.propellerheads.se/products/r ... frame.html


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2002-03-14 08:26 ]</font>
coc999
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Idonotknowanymore
Contact:

Post by coc999 »

I feel like this on my pulsar plateform:
http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/activity/act701.html
:smile:que viva Pz!
caleb
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by caleb »

I suppose in a way it isn't crucial to me as I'm a user of both the Pulsar platform and the VST platform so I can always profit from the creativity of VST developers.

However, it does seem to be a bit of a shame.

On the other hand, I'm not going to complain too much because I haven't got one Zarg synth and they look pretty impressive. Hmmmmmmm! To buy or not to buy!
Caleb

Happiness is the hidden behind the obvious.
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

coc999
Funny, just do not believe it. Anyway, from what I know about Carbon and its four bindings (group4), that guy is just not possible. Also nice shadows, right? :lol:

Immanuel
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
eliam
Posts: 1093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by eliam »

I think I agree with Kensuguro about a totally democratic platform with the possibility of developing some original atoms and whatever piece of software is required. Of course I can understand the attitude of cw because they've surely invested huge amounts of energy to get all their stuff going, but... If cw doesn't really open their platform, then I believe that those who will do it will win in the end... It's like if the government decided that a certain list of foods that they choose would be grown sold and nothing else. It couldn't last because people will want to choose what they want to eat... Since music is our food, we want to eat whatever can be grown on our soil that we like, and so is it with devices... In the end, those who will permit everyone who wish to create their own plug-ins will win the Hearts of the crowd and I hope that cw sees that clearly, because I like their direction.
There could be certain regulating structures to guide the development, but it has to be totally democratic in the end, and nothing less!!
What do you think?
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Agree 110% :smile:
Post Reply