it's all good! please don't think i was dressing anyone down!
2448 / 1632
-
King of Snake
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
- Contact:
-
Liquid Len
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Home By The Sea
I just asked Ralf at CW, he sez
>>All new mixers working same way. Delay comp. is only there
where it can be turned on/off.<<
So we HAVE been told.
I asked because I use the 1632 because I am used to it and it is easy... the 2448 is also fine. I also use mini mixers around the set up, and I heard them (with my ear holes) as all the same. So it is nice to get it confirmed...
It would be a bit daft if a mini mixer was not as 'clean' or whatever as the main mixer you are using.
>>All new mixers working same way. Delay comp. is only there
where it can be turned on/off.<<
So we HAVE been told.
I asked because I use the 1632 because I am used to it and it is easy... the 2448 is also fine. I also use mini mixers around the set up, and I heard them (with my ear holes) as all the same. So it is nice to get it confirmed...
It would be a bit daft if a mini mixer was not as 'clean' or whatever as the main mixer you are using.
when I changed from 16/32 to first using 24/48, I remember it clearly sounding better so I never went back, this is from memory though & that was a few years back, & back then when I changed I could have been using different drivers, or had some other settings screwed up, so this thread has made me want to go back & check (esp if 16/32 is dsp lighter).
- the19thbear
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
ok
the 16(whater ever its called..) mixer is dsp liggter, but the faders and panpots arent as smooth sounding as the bigger brother.. when you pull a fader down you can hear the 127 midi steps. the bigger brother mixer has interpolated steps. sounds clean and smooth when you move faders/panpots!