maybe i've special needs, look at my previous post. i do recording, mixing, mastering all in the same project. i had the problem that my projects needed near 100% of the dsps. when this is the case, you can't fiddle around with some new effects i.e. without having dsp overloads an that stuff, i hate that. that's why i added a third scope pro...Stompa81 wrote:Would this be the case for making a typical dance track?? need 3 pro's?? or is it more for recording pourposes??katano wrote: all i want to say is that if you consider to do 'serious' multitracking (24 channels), mixing and mastering in scope, you should get at least two scope pros 2nd generation. for my needs, it wasn't even enough. i'm working with 3 scope pros now...
cheers
roman
you can of course split these steps and save loads of dsp. for a standard rock project you may could work with a single scope pro. for dance music it depends on how many synths and poliphony on these you need...
cheers
roman