Subject: controller
yea,,,i asked b4 i boughtmy pulsar,,,described the exact setup i was going to by,,and they said it would work,,,$3000 us dollar spent on mackie hui,,,,and 2 year later i still cant use it!!!
Pulsar II control surfaces? (by soultrip)
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
Subject: Yeah, sure!
Thats what they said about the Motormix.... until I called CM Automation and asked them... They said to wait until the Pulsar software was more sophisticated. I guess that means that it is not supported as Creamware has advertized (sound familiar?). I don't know what the difference is really. Won't any of these work if you send the Midi source into the Sequencer Dest and then send the Sequencer Source back into any pulsar module? Sorry if this seems ignorant, but I don't know the technicalities. Does a control surface have to be directly interfaced into the pulsar project via the MIDI source to be called "supported" by creamware? In that case, the SAC 2K is USB, so you will have to go through the Sequencer Source anyway. Does anyone use the Motormix succesfully?
Thats what they said about the Motormix.... until I called CM Automation and asked them... They said to wait until the Pulsar software was more sophisticated. I guess that means that it is not supported as Creamware has advertized (sound familiar?). I don't know what the difference is really. Won't any of these work if you send the Midi source into the Sequencer Dest and then send the Sequencer Source back into any pulsar module? Sorry if this seems ignorant, but I don't know the technicalities. Does a control surface have to be directly interfaced into the pulsar project via the MIDI source to be called "supported" by creamware? In that case, the SAC 2K is USB, so you will have to go through the Sequencer Source anyway. Does anyone use the Motormix succesfully?
-
Guest
Subject: Re: Yeah, sure!
---> Does a control surface have to be directly interfaced into the pulsar project via the MIDI source to be called "supported" by creamware? <---
if you do like this, the device isn´t needed to be supported, that´s quite clear, isn´t it? what they mean is special support like loadable preferences due to the bigmixer, or something like that i think.
---> Does a control surface have to be directly interfaced into the pulsar project via the MIDI source to be called "supported" by creamware? <---
if you do like this, the device isn´t needed to be supported, that´s quite clear, isn´t it? what they mean is special support like loadable preferences due to the bigmixer, or something like that i think.
-
Guest
-
Guest
Subject: that hurts
yupp, that is expensive, i know different ways to get rid of my money
if you want a midi fader box
- Kenton Control Freak (http://www.generation.net/~musicr/Grkent.htm)
- Doepfer Regelwerk (http://www.doepfer.com/home_e.htm)
- Peavey PC 1600x (http://www.peavey.com/mi/pc_1600x.html)
yupp, that is expensive, i know different ways to get rid of my money
if you want a midi fader box
- Kenton Control Freak (http://www.generation.net/~musicr/Grkent.htm)
- Doepfer Regelwerk (http://www.doepfer.com/home_e.htm)
- Peavey PC 1600x (http://www.peavey.com/mi/pc_1600x.html)
-
vascomusic
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2001 4:00 pm
- Contact: