
VM-1242 .. no longer available
-
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: germany, east
Could you do a bypass or "unload device from DSP" kind of feature for this too? Like some sort of hybernation mode.
Say I try to load this up in XTC mode (I haven't tried yet though - I'll get back to it) and I want to save my DSP for processing individual tracks before mixdown (with your mixer), this would be pretty handy for dynamically allocating my resources to where I need them
..
Do you think this would be possible?
Say I try to load this up in XTC mode (I haven't tried yet though - I'll get back to it) and I want to save my DSP for processing individual tracks before mixdown (with your mixer), this would be pretty handy for dynamically allocating my resources to where I need them

Do you think this would be possible?
I guess you missed me saying this the other day ...

So it's already doneShroomz wrote:What I've done tonight is add 2 on/off dsp switches which don't require the addition of more circuitry to compensate. One switch releases the WHOLE device from dsp which could be handy. The second switch releases ALL of the aux sends & returns from dsp which frees almost 2 whole dsps without breaking the main channel signal paths. Works great!!

Your mixer loads up in XTC mode using the DEV->MDL-rename trick. 
However, I am having problems phase cancelling with your mixer. The DSP management one is obviously more efficient, but its not silent.
I am running + signal into odd numbered channels and - signal into pair numbered channels from the sequencer.
None of the mixers are silent. The difference seem to be that the non-DSP managed mixer has this obvious out of phasing sound (no lows, shrill highs), while the DSP-managed mixer has this audiable crackling sound.
It kind of sounds cool. Like a radio cought between stations or something.
I guess this is meant to be due to the tube-simulated circuits? Some non-linearites must be.

However, I am having problems phase cancelling with your mixer. The DSP management one is obviously more efficient, but its not silent.
I am running + signal into odd numbered channels and - signal into pair numbered channels from the sequencer.
None of the mixers are silent. The difference seem to be that the non-DSP managed mixer has this obvious out of phasing sound (no lows, shrill highs), while the DSP-managed mixer has this audiable crackling sound.
It kind of sounds cool. Like a radio cought between stations or something.
I guess this is meant to be due to the tube-simulated circuits? Some non-linearites must be.
v0.5 is available in the first post !!! 
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 30&start=0
You mentioned that the mixers aren't silent & yes, that is the case. It's a product of the mixer's ECC83 tube sims. I'm looking into this issue

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 30&start=0
I'll look into that Voidar, but I can't promise anything!voidar wrote:Would it be possible to add a stereo input that will operate during full bypass that just passes the audio to Mix output? Or perhaps better, just a monitor input like the STM 2448/4896 which routes straight to mix out that won't be effected by the full bypass/power-off.
You mentioned that the mixers aren't silent & yes, that is the case. It's a product of the mixer's ECC83 tube sims. I'm looking into this issue
