Pulsar XTC ASIO - STOOOPID ?

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Scotty
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:17 pm

Pulsar XTC ASIO - STOOOPID ?

Post by Scotty »

Ok, what happens to the ULL speed if you add an pulsar XTC to to pulsar I system? WHen you add a pulsar II to the a pulsar 1 card you can do lower than 13ms at 44.1 mhz . Will dropping in an XTC do the same? I know that the xtc has no IO but does it have the faster clock?
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

Only guessing, but could not see what difference IO has to do with this.
Should work as Pulsar2 if the XTC is set to first card.
DSP ADD!CT
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: unknown galaxy

Post by DSP ADD!CT »

i think the pulsar 1s lowest ulli setting is 13ms so if u cascade a pulsar2 then it will still be the same.
only 2nd generation cards can work with lower ulli settings.

cheers

DSP ADD!CT
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

regarding latency any 2nd generation card will do 'before' a Pulsar One and give you the lower ULLI values, but there is a certain degree in IO performance.
That was the answer I got from CWA tech support a couple of years ago on exactly the same question.
Yet this setup doesn't seem to work with all mobos (or all cards ?), as recent threads under 'problem solving' show.

cheers, Tom
Post Reply