Scope 4.5 ?
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Did you miss this thread? Or this one? Or perhaps this thread might cover some of the arguments.
Oh, here's yet another thread. And another. Yet more
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2006-02-15 14:06 ]</font>
Oh, here's yet another thread. And another. Yet more
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2006-02-15 14:06 ]</font>
I'm envious of you because you have the time for staying hours in front of the monitor reading posts, but I've read only the information on the Creamware website, that's the reason why I wrote this post. But I haven't been lucky with the answers
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: claudioD on 2006-02-16 05:58 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: claudioD on 2006-02-16 05:58 ]</font>
since you are asking nicely claudioD
We paid the 98 euro for the upgrade deal after having installed 4.5 weeks & weeks beforehand.
We registered 4.5 to our PulsarII which already had S&S & M&M packs on it. The reason we took the deal was mainly because we would be getting VDAT, Pro-12 & SBCough for 98euro. It was an excellent deal & we have taken a very big liking to VDAT, which is a very nice tool indeed.
That's my experience put politely.

We paid the 98 euro for the upgrade deal after having installed 4.5 weeks & weeks beforehand.
We registered 4.5 to our PulsarII which already had S&S & M&M packs on it. The reason we took the deal was mainly because we would be getting VDAT, Pro-12 & SBCough for 98euro. It was an excellent deal & we have taken a very big liking to VDAT, which is a very nice tool indeed.
That's my experience put politely.
-
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
- Contact:
of course, other people should take time out of their schedule to answer your question, rather than you spending some time doing a simple forum searchOn 2006-02-16 05:51, claudioD wrote:
I'm envious of you because you have the time for staying hours in front of the monitor reading posts, but I've read only the information on the Creamware website, that's the reason why I wrote this post. But I haven't been lucky with the answers

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2006-02-16 06:35 ]</font>
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
You shouldn't get so worked up about version numbers. You don't have to upgrade/update/whatever... if you took the time to read the threads you'll realise why we just can't be bothered to debate this yet again. The irony is that this thread will inevitably turn into yet another boring rant-filled pointless waste of space. Because people just love to rant on forums and scream their opinion at the world (sad fact of the internet).On 2006-02-16 06:12, claudioD wrote:
well I can't see the reason why CW called it "Scope 4.5", this is not an upgrade.
-
- Posts: 1963
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Bath, England
The new bronchial synth?Shroomz wrote:
...& SBCough

*HACK!* *SPLUTTER!*
Cool sounds...

I'm still on Scope 3.1c myself. I did d/l v4 when it came out, but still haven't got round to trying it out! My system's pretty stable & reliable so I'm not that tempted to change things.
I did order a new set of Grover machine heads for my renovated acoustic today though! £35 - a bargain I thought. The old 'uns are cream crackered and go out of tune pretty quickly. Unplugged ahoy!
same hereOn 2006-02-16 08:54, Counterparts wrote:
...I'm still on Scope 3.1c myself. I did d/l v4 when it came out, but still haven't got round to trying it out! My system's pretty stable & reliable so I'm not that tempted to change things...

...but I went electric recently with a G+L Strat (tribute series) - a computer manufactured Korean plank - but holy sh*t my face dropped slackjaw when I tried it in the shop... how can it be THAT good ?
cheers, Tom