I just noticed something strange. The saw+triangle waveform (second choice from the left) sounds completely different on oscillator 3 than it does on oscillators 1 and 2. On oscillator 3, saw+triangle sounds just like saw (third from the left).
I never noticed this before because I usually use oscillator 3 as an LFO.
Can anyone else confirm this? I have the latest OS installed.
Regards,
Mike
MiniMax Oscillator 3
MiniMax Oscillator 3
I just re-read the Sound on Sound review. Apparently this is intentional. It would have been nice if Creamware changed the front panel graphics accordingly:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan06/a ... maxasb.htm
"Creamware have varied one of oscillator 3's waveforms, replacing the mixed triangle/sawtooth with a reverse sawtooth (although this isn't shown on the front panel). The reverse sawtooth doesn't sound any different from the forward version, but it offers another, distinctive modulation source."
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan06/a ... maxasb.htm
"Creamware have varied one of oscillator 3's waveforms, replacing the mixed triangle/sawtooth with a reverse sawtooth (although this isn't shown on the front panel). The reverse sawtooth doesn't sound any different from the forward version, but it offers another, distinctive modulation source."
Re: MiniMax Oscillator 3
Yep, instead of the 'sharktooth' waveform Creamware used a reverse sawtooth for Osc 3 as you'll discovered. A reverse sawtooth (sometimes also called a 'ramp' waveform) sounds just like a sawtooth wave since both have the same harmonic structure (the overtones are actually 180 degrees out of phase in the ramp wave, but our ears can't hear the difference).MFF wrote:On oscillator 3, saw+triangle sounds just like saw (third from the left).
Can anyone else confirm this? I have the latest OS installed.
Regards,
Mike
--G
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:02 am
- Contact: