Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:09 am
i wants to reinstall the pulsar2 v3.1 and cubase 5vst. what kind of system i have to install 98se ore xp? i have an amd 850mhz, 256ram.
PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com
Scope Users Community
https://forums.scopeusers.com/
win. 98se ore xp
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:57 am
To be HAPPY. Intel Chipset, Asus mobo, 512 MB memory and XP
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:18 am
thanx, but i miss the correct answer!!!
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:40 am
You actually got abre's version on the correct answer. Opinions are diverse i this matter. You will find people doing better with XP and others doing best with 98se.
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 7:14 am
if i were you i wouldn't upgrade vst or win98... i just had a horrible week end with sx (cannot work with it). xp doesn't bring much i think for music....
no "need" to upgrade really.
my next system will be mac anyway..
no "need" to upgrade really.
my next system will be mac anyway..
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 9:36 am
xp is much better to me.
after few simple tweakings i'm able to set much lower latency (3ms) with much more stability.
so, vote to xp
after few simple tweakings i'm able to set much lower latency (3ms) with much more stability.
so, vote to xp
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 4:47 pm
XP, SX, and SFP 3.1c have made for the most stable combo on my CW system yet!
I even have had no problems with the much maligned Athlon XP... (And there are serious bang for the buck considerations IMO!)
-mythalethe
I even have had no problems with the much maligned Athlon XP... (And there are serious bang for the buck considerations IMO!)
-mythalethe
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:13 pm
the latency issue is good for wave or for asio ?
I think XP is fine (what is better is a better cpu/ram here) but is it really "needed", i'm not really sure, although i use it with sx (which sounds better than vst).
I think XP is fine (what is better is a better cpu/ram here) but is it really "needed", i'm not really sure, although i use it with sx (which sounds better than vst).
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 6:16 pm
i also had a 3 days nightmare under sx, now it seems to be solved (seems to be a dongle issue, when you install patches etc). So i would advise xp/sx too, but if there were some cubase rep around me, they would be dead right now 
edited : about the latency : if you could give more details it's appreciated. I beleive it's for wave only, but not asio, right or wrong?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spacef on 2003-01-27 18:26 ]</font>
edited : about the latency : if you could give more details it's appreciated. I beleive it's for wave only, but not asio, right or wrong?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spacef on 2003-01-27 18:26 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 11:30 pm
no,it affects asio.
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:37 am
mmm, for asio ? i thought asio was dependant of your hardware. Here i use version 1 board from creamware (no ulli, 13 ms latency max). if someone could be so kind as to post a "tip and trick" or enlight me in how i could improve this....
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spacef on 2003-01-28 02:41 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spacef on 2003-01-28 02:41 ]</font>
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 3:43 am
v1 board doesn't do any better,i'm sorry to say.
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 3:59 am
With your current setup, it might be taken into considderation, that XP uses more of your computers power - especially your RAM.