Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 6:56 am
by helldriver
I´m running win98 with Pulsar 3.01 with no problems and want go with winXP in the near future.
i don´t wanna upgrade to sfp yet (because of my projects). maybe I wanna install them together pulsar3.01 + sfp3.1c.
my question is:
is 3.01 running stable and without problems under winXP????
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:23 am
by Spirit
Moving from 98 to XPhome on 3.01 was the biggest stability improvement I've ever had with Pulsar.
Moving from 3.01 to 3.1 was the next best
. Things just "feel" solid now - or maybe I've just got over the jitters I use to have from getting base.dll crashes ...
Happily I haven't seen one of those in a loooooong time now.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 8:48 am
by braincell
It at least won't hurt provided you have a powerful enough computer.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:39 am
by helldriver
is xp eating up more resources than win98se especially focused on cpu?
i have a p3 with 933mhz and 512mb ram.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:51 pm
by garyb
remove all non essential services and use 3.1c.it's good........
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 1:01 pm
by at0m
Here's how little RAM XP can be set up to use:
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:53 pm
by Lotuz
I had some problems with the Pulsar 3.0 software and Cubase SX (crackle when recording MIDI and/or audio) on WinXP, but SFP 3.1c fixed it. And I can set the latency than before.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2002 8:03 pm
by helldriver
lotuz, did you have the problems with 3.01a or was it 3.0
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: helldriver on 2002-10-12 21:03 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2002 4:11 am
by Lotuz
I'm not sure which version, but they both use the same drivers. So I think both versions will have the same problem with SX.