Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2002 2:34 pm
by fra77x
Hello to all, do u use 96khz? I like the sound more both for pulsar and for vst instruments. I 'm using 48 khz right now. Luckily reactor can «double» it's internal resolution (works in 96khz). Is there a problem for downsampling to 44100? What do u use for the convertion?
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2002 6:09 pm
by Grok
Do the conversion 48>>>>>44,1kHz only at the final end of your sound processing, with the best quality available (low speed)
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2002 1:08 am
by garyb
downsampling is not the best thing to do.....
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2002 5:29 am
by King of Snake
Well, all my tracks get burned to cd at one point so there's little sense in working in anything else than 44.1 Khz
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2002 7:59 am
by Grok
>>>precision
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2002 8:56 am
by Mr Arkadin
Unless you're doing some mad DVD-A 96kHz surround mix or working a lot for television (48kHz) I really don't see the point in working in anything other than 44.1 (plus those audio files start geting pretty big). If you want to increase your dynamic range you're probably better off recording in 24 bit rather than 16 bit (or are you going the whole hog with 32 bit
) and then dithering down to 16 bit for the final master, keeping it all in 44.1 of course.
TonyR
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: TonyR on 2002-07-18 09:56 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2002 8:58 am
by Mr Arkadin
Unless you're doing some mad DVD-A 96kHz surround mix or working a lot for television (48kHz) I really don't see the point in working in anything other than 44.1 (plus those audio files start geting pretty big). If you want to increase your dynamic range you're probably better off recording in 24 bit rather than 16 bit (or are you going the whole hog with 32 bit
) and then dithering down to 16 bit for the final master, keeping it all in 44.1 of course.
TonyR