Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:50 pm
by jupiter8
From the CW forum:
think modelling vintage gear for creamware would definately boost creamware
sales cos i'm now thinking of buying an universal audio uad-1 and not a extra
srb for my DAW. Something like modelled vintage compressors eq's and
echo/effects would be very nice.........
And this is what Ingo Raven answered:
Wait a short while, you will be surprised
I think there up to something.
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 1:55 pm
by snoopy4ever
mmm...sounds interesting... I wonder how soon/late that will be???
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: snoopy4ever on 2002-06-12 14:58 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 2:07 pm
by Tony B
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 2:44 pm
by thermos
this is great news.
gives me faith.
if its something close to waves,bombfactory and other protools plugs then cw will be a contender in the big leauge.
thermos.
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 7:10 pm
by CAPO
On 2002-06-12 15:07, abre11 wrote:
Don't cause too much excitement.
Yeah, for real... Though I have a feeling its already too late!

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2002 11:08 pm
by Guest
If the plugin with UAD-1 quality that we can only use 2 or 4 with 6DSP, then it's not very attracting.
Just use what you have for now and don't dream too much.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Late on 2002-06-13 01:23 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 3:29 am
by King of Snake
That's your standard answer isn't it?
Your positive vibes are sooo encouraging

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 3:37 am
by thermos
2 maybe 4...6 sharcs.. i dont know.
But one thing for shure ill never invite you to a party at my home, you seem determined to ruin everyones fun.
hehe
you cant compare a pulsar in power with uad1 or powercore, youll have to think scope.
ill save you the time of replaying "scope is much more expensive".
Ill answear that right away
scope is also a pro quality soundcard with alot more flexibility. with pro plugs it would be up compeating with the best audio systems availible today. Systems that again are even more expensive than scope.
someone once told me "i still see new things in life". so open your eyes and explore your cw cards to the fullest and youll be making music in sfp heaven with the rest of us in no time.
its all about how you use it.
thermos
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: thermos on 2002-06-13 05:08 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 4:20 am
by thermos
ingo raven said on the cw forum today:
As the release is very near anyway, I will tell you more details:
We modelled a well-known analog vintage compressor (you might guess which) as a SFP device. Sound and look is like the original, but with some additional features.
Most important: the sound
Ingo,
CreamWare

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 4:46 am
by krizrox
Huh? Did I miss something? There are already some vintage modeled devices out there. Maybe, more than a few. For sure, a good example is the Level-Devil (compressor/limiter).
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 11:26 am
by Sunshine
I must admit, I´m a bit surprised...
Because to model those units which have been already modelled so often, is a great challenge I think.
What I would like to see is a
"Fairchild 660" as a
"multiband-linear phase-silverline-audiophile-manipulator-finalizer-destractor" (with a built in stereo spreader btw)
No, I think that´s a strategically clever move from CW that will probably boost sales numbers...
Regards,
Sunshine
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 11:33 am
by King of Snake
Damn, now I'll have to wait and hear what this compressor does (and how much it costs!) before going out and buying the timeworks. It looks like it might get some competition.
Vintage modelling is good IMO in that vintage gear has proven it's quality and usability, so if your model approaches it in some way, you know users will like it.
I hope they have some more original stuff in the pipeline too. (some NI style products for SFP would be nice, and then I don't mean the vintage ones!

)
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 6:28 pm
by Guest
It sounds like whatever you said is right but it doesn't really matter. I'm not in love with pulsar and i'm not plainning to buy DSPs like many others said (only when the DSPhardware drop to reasonable price) but I will keep using it because i'm used to it and because the finacial issuses so i will use what I have to make music.
I just find people fantasizing all the time are bothering me, especially in Korg Oasys, UAD-1, and creamware fourms.
I find those people are having too much time to waste instead of making music.
Sorry for ruin the fun.
On 2002-06-13 04:37, thermos wrote:
2 maybe 4...6 sharcs.. i dont know.
But one thing for shure ill never invite you to a party at my home, you seem determined to ruin everyones fun.
hehe
you cant compare a pulsar in power with uad1 or powercore, youll have to think scope.
ill save you the time of replaying "scope is much more expensive".
Ill answear that right away
scope is also a pro quality soundcard with alot more flexibility. with pro plugs it would be up compeating with the best audio systems availible today. Systems that again are even more expensive than scope.
someone once told me "i still see new things in life". so open your eyes and explore your cw cards to the fullest and youll be making music in sfp heaven with the rest of us in no time.
its all about how you use it.
thermos
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: thermos on 2002-06-13 05:08 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Late on 2002-06-13 19:34 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:30 pm
by Grok
You're right: we have to be realistics.
But, because I'am an artist and childish minded, I always like to dream and waiste time.
So long I dreamed and then came Pulsar; it has gave me the feelings of my dreams becoming true (the marketing work was perfect); I know SFP 3.1 is great and near to perfection, it will be a perfection soon.
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 1:31 am
by Sunshine
-You get gear that was nearly un-payable in the past..
-Sales numbers will be boosted, which leads to more money for development...
-You will be able to colour and shape your mix...
-Not having the right front-end won´t be such a deficit anymore...
But honestly, I think the more someone is into recording, the more he will acknowledge the importance of gear. Vintage gear has the characteristic of warming-up/coloring something. What to do? when you have to record a person whith a thin sounding voice? You have to do something! And please don´t tell me you will boost 130-200hz, which CAN increase fullness to vocals, but when done too often will add mudiness to the whole mix. Boosting any fundamentals would lead to "indistinction" in the case of instruments playing the same part, because they are closer to "sounding the same". So an "alternative" to boosting warm freqs would be simply using vintage gear. That´s the reasom why people are soo after those Neve 1272´s although they are a little fragile. But I must admit, that it´s all also a matter of taste and depends on things like track-count... The larger the trackcount the sooner you will need that type of gear, because you can´t boost the warm freqs on every track. Although I haven´t got the UAD-1 I understand why people decide to take the plunge.
BTW, what I would really like to see is a "tape simulator" whith the real characteristics (not only the sound) of a Studer or Revox, but whithout the phase-shift.
Regards,
Sunshine
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:02 am
by Fede
creamware's getting serious finally?

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 5:27 am
by spiderman
a pdf for the new vinco (vintage compressor) is available on the CW site . looks really nice ... 8^)
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spiderman on 2002-06-14 06:29 ]</font>
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 6:33 am
by Kamurah
Cool.....1176 is the emulation.....
I was wondering which one they would pick...1176, LA-2A, Fairchild, etc.....
Hope it sounds good, but I bet it will

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 6:36 am
by orbita
anyone got the url for the pdf?
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:04 am
by spiderman