Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:07 am
hello pulsarians!.
I want to thank to DXL his titanic effort to convince us all about the "bad hardware" CW is. The thing is that he has put all his energy to convince me that the hardware is slow, bad supported and way too expensive. The final result for all this is that if CW were that bad, none of you guys have ever been involved in such big discussions against all the Dxl's arguments. I've seen 98% of you pointing out valid and good points in favor of CW. I've learn a bunch of things about this platform thanks to all your posts. Now I'm convinced that even the hardware is not as "new", it does not mean that is not functional anymore, it's still the most flexible open platform available, even the newest Dsp cards don't show the performance CW has.
So thanks DXL, your efforts have shown cracks yes..., cracks on the other manufacturer's audio cards.
snoopy
I want to thank to DXL his titanic effort to convince us all about the "bad hardware" CW is. The thing is that he has put all his energy to convince me that the hardware is slow, bad supported and way too expensive. The final result for all this is that if CW were that bad, none of you guys have ever been involved in such big discussions against all the Dxl's arguments. I've seen 98% of you pointing out valid and good points in favor of CW. I've learn a bunch of things about this platform thanks to all your posts. Now I'm convinced that even the hardware is not as "new", it does not mean that is not functional anymore, it's still the most flexible open platform available, even the newest Dsp cards don't show the performance CW has.
So thanks DXL, your efforts have shown cracks yes..., cracks on the other manufacturer's audio cards.
snoopy