Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2002 9:55 pm
by dxl
why DAM not ATA?
which one is faster and better?
ATA eat more CPU?

Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2002 10:00 pm
by kensuguro
you mean DMA..
I thought DMA was just a transfer mode of ATAPI. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. :smile:

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2002 6:02 am
by MeloManiac
ATA is the interface standard, DMA is the way data is transfered. As the name, Direct Memory Access says, it goes directly from the drive to the memory, over PCI bus, instead of through CPU.

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2002 4:00 pm
by dxl
but which one gives u they faster transfer rate?

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2002 6:01 pm
by Michu
i guess best transfer rate is when DMA is checked for ATA drive properties.
i dig Seagates, YMMV

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2002 7:12 pm
by dxl
DMA driver is already in win98se
then why give ATA driver?

Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2002 12:19 am
by sandrob
i had cracking problems when i use old ata controlers (win98se). you must instal new version of ultra ata storage driver!

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2002 6:55 am
by Rob van Berkel
On 2002-03-11 00:19, sandrob wrote:
you must instal new version of ultra ata storage driver!
All depending on the chipset in use, of course. e.g. IAA (Intel Application Accelerator) is necessary for correct UDMA-100 operation on Intel 8xx chipsets. Via has the 4-in-1 driverset. Depending on the OS different parts of the via-set need to be installed.

Rob

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2002 6:20 pm
by Drum-Maker
ATA = Atachment

Ata is as it says the atachment type cable connected between the motherboard and the HD, and the best one is the Ultra ata 133 > with a 80 wire cable ... It's only 40 pin but every pin has 2 wire ... just in case if one is brocken ... at least is there another one.

In win 98 Se you can choose the Hd or Cd rom transfert mode (DMA enabled), but in win 2000 and Xp is automatically recognized.

Cheers :smile:)