Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2002 10:23 pm
I can load 5, but it takes a retry.
I have put Pulsar1 in PCI slot1 and given it high priority in BIOS.
winXP detects Pulsar1 on IRQ5
b.t.w.
In my MB manual, I get a priority list. But I don't know wich way to read it:
System timer on IRQ 0 has priority 1
Does that mean FIRST priority or LOWEST priority?
The Pulsar1 is very close to its PCI limit, when I load the 5th MV. Can that be the reason for the PCI-capacity-limmit? I mean: If I but a Luna2 as an add-on, will that make me load more MVs, or will I be stuck with 5 with a retry?
Ofcoarse, I will never make a project with MVs taking such huge %age of the DSPs, but from, what other people write, this is a very bad result for a tusl2-c. Today I bought the MB and CPU. It replaces a Duron 800MHz on a ECS k7s5a. I did not do it for power, I did it for bandwith, and so far, I feel, I got very little for my money
Immanuel
I have put Pulsar1 in PCI slot1 and given it high priority in BIOS.
winXP detects Pulsar1 on IRQ5
b.t.w.
In my MB manual, I get a priority list. But I don't know wich way to read it:
System timer on IRQ 0 has priority 1
Does that mean FIRST priority or LOWEST priority?
The Pulsar1 is very close to its PCI limit, when I load the 5th MV. Can that be the reason for the PCI-capacity-limmit? I mean: If I but a Luna2 as an add-on, will that make me load more MVs, or will I be stuck with 5 with a retry?
Ofcoarse, I will never make a project with MVs taking such huge %age of the DSPs, but from, what other people write, this is a very bad result for a tusl2-c. Today I bought the MB and CPU. It replaces a Duron 800MHz on a ECS k7s5a. I did not do it for power, I did it for bandwith, and so far, I feel, I got very little for my money

Immanuel