Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2002 4:24 pm
Hey everyone,
am I the only one to notice this....
when I read the press release from namm...I thought cool....the new 3.1 software is going to be a unified package between the cards and live bar is a new kind of control panel, but then read it again. Is live bar supposed to be some sort of truly integrated xtc mode?
The biggest problem with xtc is the latency and losing the flexibility/routing of the the pulsar environment. From creamware description, it would seem live bar is some sort of xtc mode with no latency and all the flexibility of pulsar system. here's a quote...
"It is also possible to integrate external studio equipment live into the audio sequencer. For example, you can route a microphone through the SCOPE DSP effects in realtime, or you can send audio tracks from your recording software out to an external 19" effects rack for processing and back again – likewise in realtime."
I thought this kind of thing was impossible due to latency issues?
any comments...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jtek on 2002-02-09 16:27 ]</font>
am I the only one to notice this....
when I read the press release from namm...I thought cool....the new 3.1 software is going to be a unified package between the cards and live bar is a new kind of control panel, but then read it again. Is live bar supposed to be some sort of truly integrated xtc mode?
The biggest problem with xtc is the latency and losing the flexibility/routing of the the pulsar environment. From creamware description, it would seem live bar is some sort of xtc mode with no latency and all the flexibility of pulsar system. here's a quote...
"It is also possible to integrate external studio equipment live into the audio sequencer. For example, you can route a microphone through the SCOPE DSP effects in realtime, or you can send audio tracks from your recording software out to an external 19" effects rack for processing and back again – likewise in realtime."
I thought this kind of thing was impossible due to latency issues?
any comments...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jtek on 2002-02-09 16:27 ]</font>