Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2002 5:24 am
Let's just suppose that someone was building a sequencer for Pulsar - and I'm sure that's not far away - what features do you want in it? Let's not try to add everything you've ever wanted in VST - save that for version 2. Let's just define the general parameters and "feel" of the device.
For some background about why I think this is a good idea, or if you want to argue that it's a bad idea, then please go here:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... orum=11&16
But if you don't need to be convinced and have some positive ideas to contribute, then read on....
Some things are obvious: MIDI sequencer with quantise, adjustable grid size, controller info, program change, loop points, loop "layer" record, replace record etc etc.
The not so obvious:
<b>CPU-based: </b>Since you won't be running VST or Cakewalk, let's use your CPU to drive the Pulsar sequencer.
<b>Audio recording: </b>Like all good sequencers you should be able to record direct audio. But let's not expect too much, if you want complex audio functions go to your STS - this is a simple sequencer. Some elements of TripleDAT could be used here.
<b>Export audio: </b> My favourite. It's great to have a VSTi MIDI track and then just export it as a perfectly looped wav file. This same function would be perfect for Pulsar. Imagine your complex Lightwave or Ambient riff instantly dumped as a perfectly synced wav file in the Pulsar sequencer. Then delete your DSP-hogging device and load another. Easy and fast. If you want to tweak your track then reload the synth and re-export.
<b>PulsarMixer integration:</b> Not sure how this should work, but the PulsarMixer is so good it seems a natural partner to a Pulsar sequencer.
<b>A name: </b>I'm already tired of calling it "the Pulsar sequencer", so how about a working title of <i>Venus</i> ?
cheers,
Spirit
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2002-01-20 05:26 ]</font>
For some background about why I think this is a good idea, or if you want to argue that it's a bad idea, then please go here:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... orum=11&16
But if you don't need to be convinced and have some positive ideas to contribute, then read on....
Some things are obvious: MIDI sequencer with quantise, adjustable grid size, controller info, program change, loop points, loop "layer" record, replace record etc etc.
The not so obvious:
<b>CPU-based: </b>Since you won't be running VST or Cakewalk, let's use your CPU to drive the Pulsar sequencer.
<b>Audio recording: </b>Like all good sequencers you should be able to record direct audio. But let's not expect too much, if you want complex audio functions go to your STS - this is a simple sequencer. Some elements of TripleDAT could be used here.
<b>Export audio: </b> My favourite. It's great to have a VSTi MIDI track and then just export it as a perfectly looped wav file. This same function would be perfect for Pulsar. Imagine your complex Lightwave or Ambient riff instantly dumped as a perfectly synced wav file in the Pulsar sequencer. Then delete your DSP-hogging device and load another. Easy and fast. If you want to tweak your track then reload the synth and re-export.
<b>PulsarMixer integration:</b> Not sure how this should work, but the PulsarMixer is so good it seems a natural partner to a Pulsar sequencer.
<b>A name: </b>I'm already tired of calling it "the Pulsar sequencer", so how about a working title of <i>Venus</i> ?
cheers,
Spirit
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Spirit on 2002-01-20 05:26 ]</font>