PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

the emails:

support@soniccore.de
info@soniccore.de
sales@soniccore.de

seem no more active.

Does anyone know about Sonic Core status / activity ?

Garyb is your contact

support@soniccore.de works here. i have been answering emails just this morning.

yep, just tested it. i sent an email to support and it popped right up in the inbox....

Emails still not working from my servers :-/

Have you read the previous posts?

I have tried again to write them and their emails addresses non existent.

Depends what your asking them. Send an order for 5 XITE-1's and see if you get a reply

what emails are inactive?

i have been answering emails all morning!

i NEVER ignore emails unless they are spam. ever.


what is the issue?
maybe it's your email server that isn't working...maybe responses are caught in your email server's spam folder...

Garyb I didn't realized that you are working IN SonicCore !!
Nice to know that Sonic Core is alive and kicking !

Don't know why but I'm getting these replies (I'm pretty sure support@soniccore.de worked in the past):

Final-Recipient: rfc822; info@soniccore.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;info@soniccore.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx01.kundenserver.de
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable 550
invalid DNS MX or A/AAAA resource record

Final-Recipient: rfc822; sales@soniccore.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;sales@soniccore.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx01.kundenserver.de
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable 550
invalid DNS MX or A/AAAA resource record

Final-Recipient: rfc822; support@soniccore.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;support@soniccore.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx01.kundenserver.de
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable 550
invalid DNS MX or A/AAAA resource record

While I am writing/receiveing emails continuously without any problems, so maybe my emails are considered spam by your servers :-/ ?

I will PM you.

sure, i saw and answered your pm and i tried the email addresses. they work here. i'm not sure which end there's a problem, but maybe you have a different email address to try writing from?

Your attention, please...

Death is the only truly certainty.

Thanks for your attention.

There is more talk here of VSTs than SCOPE, lately

Well after mastering the awesome beast we must feed it.
Those wishing instant gratification get mature VSTi synths like Omni and Zebra.
The more MIDI DIY guys use Modular and have signature sounding tracks.

I still use an instance of Mod IV just for a single preset from an Adern Flexor III patch called Nebula.
I control LFO rates and depth via MIDI and there's no synth out there that sounds like this.

Folks here could spend tons of time learning Modular but when you're after something you hear it's so much easier settling for a little less quality in sound just to get your ideas tracked.

But anyone seeking real glory just needs to learn SDK and Modular.
No need for other stuff if a signature sound is what you're after.

AS LONG AS OTHER DSP PLUGINS PRODUCE MORE LATENCY THAN CREAMWARE ANALOG DEVICE DSP C++ PLUGINS SDK DEVELOPMENT.
SONICCORE WILL SURVIVE!
tdm more latence tahn dev.
rtas more latency than dev.
vst more more latency from dev.
don't know for avid AAX but new protools HDX is 128 samples latency at 96 khz:more latency than dev!
don't know for uad but it seems that uad apollo had problem for insering plugins in prottols track.

m.my91 wrote:AS LONG AS OTHER DSP PLUGINS PRODUCE MORE LATENCY THAN CREAMWARE ANALOG DEVICE DSP C++ PLUGINS SDK DEVELOPMENT.
SONICCORE WILL SURVIVE.

I agree with you, and SC devices have amazing very low latency !

e.g. comparing STS5000 sampler/player with KONTACT player, the second has unacceptable delays that makes it nearly not playable in real time.

yes
i have tried kontack.
it use many ressource in ram cpu and disk place for sound.
STS sampler is far better than Kontakt.
and in the soundfont you can find the same sample using by kontakt in wav!
there's good quality soundfont now and it divide by 10 the memory and disk place to use!
so bad that soniccore doesnt developp STS sampler in 64 bit os!!!!
a big mistake from soniccore (not creamware who build the 32 bit sts sampler).
if soniccore diseapear it will be the fault of soniccore c++ ingeniors who cannot adapt scope exe with the new OS industrie.
windows 11 now !
mac i don't now (os 11..)
linux: nothing! (so bad) the better os with the min latency!
soniccore put "la charue avant les boeufs" in french : they built XITE with the old scope 5.0 32 bit! for vista!
instead of buid a new real scope for XITE and upgrade it for wondows and mac OS.

SO I TELL EVERYONE TO SEND MAIL TO SONICCORE TELLING THAT WEE WANT A FREE SCOPE OS FOR ALL CREAMWARE AND SONICCORE HARDWARE! FOR WINDOWS , MAC , LINUX !!!!

The last thing I heard was Scope 6 was soon to be released which was about 3 years ago now maybe longer. There was also a sequencer being developed by audio biscuit to host all the scope devices natively. That sounded great but its gonna be difficult to compete with the competition and isn't so important.

What is more important is what others have mentioned already STS 64 bit and some bugs [whatever? ironed out]
The preliminary pics looked great online but nothing has emerged unless its been kept secret.

Creamware were around and then S|C took were formed - Will there be another transition with another company? -
Would it be better if a bigger company bought S|C? - I'm not trying to cause a stir but merely to ask if that would be better in the long run retaining the core identity of Scope - How about NI? - or RME? - or - Steinberg / Yamaha? - All the plugins natively - Image Line - Just a dreamy post after one biscuit too many

Hope to have that Scope 6 soon, with STS 64 bit working.
Windows 8/10 now is very stable... the only thing that crashes it with blue screen are all samplers...
one of the most appreciated devices in Scope.

Oh - I'm quite sure we'll see Scope 6 "soon"